.png)
| Article title | Legal Nature of Mediation as a Consequence of Existential Features of Man | ||
| Authors |
|
||
| Name of magazine | Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version) | ||
| Issue | 3/2018 | ||
| Сторінки | [128-143] | ||
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.33498/louu-2018-03-128 | ||
| Annotation | In the periods of deep qualitative transformations – being the stage of development Ukraine is now experiencing – society has a particularly growing demand for traditional and new instruments to resolve life conflicts and reconcile social environment. In the well-developed world, particularly in the countries of the European Union, the United States and Canada, one of such efficient instruments is mediation. In 2017, with the aim of implementing the experience of these countries in the national practice, necessary changes were made to procedural legislation of Ukraine, and as a consequence, a significant array of progressive world mediation practices have been acknowledged binding upon relevant national actors. However, this immediately entailed a range of worldview-related and theoretical methodological issues for professionals as well as for the general public in Ukraine. One of them was the need to clarify the legal nature of mediation, this being the factor crucial for identifying adequately the entities able to effectively implement mediation and determining the optimal procedures for it. The purpose of this article is to provide justification for the most fundamental – human-immanent legal determinants of mediation which are concretized in the following objectives of mediation: from this perspective, to reconsider the basic existential features of man and their functional role in human existence; to discover the distinction of spontaneous (unconditional) and conditional exchanges of goods and reaches between people and to demonstrate how the latter entails the need for mediation. The subject matter, goal and objective of the study defined the methodology of this article, in particular: practical philosophy and material phenomenology which are the most efficient tools for cognition of such an “invisible” phenomenon, according to M. Henri, “as the scope of inter-subjectivity”. The generally accepted list of existential features of man has been supplemented with the provision about the attribute pertainance to this list of human needs for goods and riches. The article proves that unconditional exchange of goods and riches between people inevitably transforms the excess of human autonomy from the potential to the factual state. This new quality of human autonomy excess, being realized in communicative solidarity of people, gives rise to intrapersonal and interpersonal tensions and conflicts. In turn, the conditional exchange of goods and riches between people makes such conflicts total and extremely dangerous for existence of individuals. The author gives a well-grounded conclusion that it is the latter that constitute the principal -attribute to humans – group of determinants, which determine the need for mediation as one of the efficient means to solve life conflicts by own efforts of individuals. It is proved that mediation has a dual legal nature, since it is, firstly, a product of fundamental (consumption-oriented) way of co-existence of individuals in society, and secondly, a system of interrelated legal obligations between such individuals, with the help of which a reconciled social environment is formed. Mediation may be defined as mutual legal self-defense of individuals.
|
||
| Keywords | mediation; legal nature of mediation; human autonomy excess; human needs for goods and riches; exchange of goods and riches between people | ||
| References |
List of legal documents
Legislation Bibliography Authored books 2. Barrash D, The Whisperings Within (Harper and Row 1979) (in English). 3. Boulding K, The Organizational Revolution (Harper 1953) (in English). 4. Buchanan J, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan (University of Chicago Press 1975) (in English). 5. Bush R and Folger J, The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict (John Wiley & Sons 2004) (in English). 6. Coleman P, Ferguson R, Making Conflict Work: Harnessing the Power of Disagreement (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt 2014) (in English). 7. Ferber R, Philosophische Grundbegriffe 1 Eine Einführung [Basic Philosophical Ideas 1: Introduction] (Beck 2008) (in German). 8. Henry M, Phenomenologie materielle [Material Phenomenology] (1ere ed, Epimethee, Presses Universitaires de France 1990) (in French). 9. Kant I, Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals] (Meiner 1999) (in German). 10. Malinowski B, Crime and Custom in Savage Society (Routledge and Kegan Paul 1926) (in English). 11. March J and Simon H, The Organizations (John Wiley 1958) (in English). 12. Menkel-Meadow C and Porter-Love L, Mediation: Practice, policy, and ethics (2nd edn, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2014) (in English). 13. Messner J, Naturrecht [Natural Law] (Tirolia 1958) (in German). 14. Morgenstern O, Prolegomena to a Theory of Organization (RAND Research Memorandum 1951) (in English). 15. Nort D, Wallis J J, Weingast D R, Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History (Cambridge University Press 2009) (in English). 16. Winkle J, Mediation: A Path Back for the Lost Lawyer (American Bar Association 2004) (in English). 17. Berezhnoy N, Chelovek i ego potrebnosti [The Human Being and His Needs] (Forum 2000) (in Russian). 18. Samsin A, Sotsialno-filosofskie problemy issledovaniya potrebnostey [Socio-philosophical Problems in Needs Research] (Vyssh Shkola 1987) (in Russian).
Edited and translated books 19. Marshak J, ‘Towards an Economic Theory of Organization and Information’ in Thrall R Combs C and Davis R (eds), Decision Processes (John Wiley 1954) (in English). 20. – –, ‘Efficient and Viable Organization Forms’ in Haire M (ed), Modern Organization Theory (John Wiley 1959) (in English). 21. Mill J, ‘On Liberty Reprint from the 1st edition (1859)’ in Bromwich D and Kateb G (eds), On Liberty John Stuart Mill (Yale University Press 2006) (in English). 22. Baumeister A, Buttia i blaho [Existence and Good] (O Khoma red, T P Baranovska 2014) (in Ukrainian). 23. H’offe O, ‘Transtsendental’nyy obmin – fihura lehitymatsiyi prav lyudyny?’ [‘Transcendental Exchange – A Figure of Legitimation of Human Rights?’] in Hosepat Sh and Lomann H (eds), Yudin O ta Doronicheva L (per), Filosofiia prav liudyny [Philosophy of Human Rights] (Nіka-Centr 2008) (in Ukrainian). 24. Khayek F, Pagubnaya samonadeyannost: oshibki sotsializma [The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism] (Bartli III U red, Novosti 1992) (in Russian). 25. – –, Pravo, zakonodatelstvo i svoboda: sovremennoe ponimanie liberalnykh printsipov spravedlivosti i politiki [Law, Legislation and Liberty: a New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Policy] (Pinsker B i Kustarev A per, IRISEN 2006) (in Russian). 26. Lebedev A, ‘Protagor’ [‘Protagoras’] in Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya, tom tretiy [New Philosophical Encyclopedia, vol three] (Mysl 2010) (in Russian). 27. Malakhov V, ‘Svoboda yak nevymushenist’ [‘Freedom as Unconstraint’] in Pravo buty soboju [The Right to be Yourself] (Dukh i Litera 2008) (in Ukrainian). 28. Malinovskiy B, ‘Magiya i religiya’ [‘Magic and Religion’] in Religiya i obshchestvo: khrestomatiya po sotsialnoy religii [Religion and Society: Chrestomathy on Social Religion] (Nauka 1994) (in Russian). 29. Maslou A, Motivatsiya i lichnost [Motivation and Personality] (Tatlybaev A per, Yevraziya 1999) (in Russian). 30. Moss M, Obshchestva Obmen Lichnost: Trudy po sotsialnoy antropologii [Society Exchange Personality: Works on Social Anthropology] (Gofman A per, Knizhnyj dom-Universitet 2011) (in Russian). 31. Olson M, Loghika kolektyvnoji diji: suspiljni blagha i teorija ghrup [The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups] (Slukhai S per, Libra 2004) (in Ukrainian). 32. Raynakh A, ‘Apriornye osnovaniya grazhdanskogo prava’ [‘The Apriori Foundations of Civil Law’] in Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works] (Kurennoj V per, Dom intellektual’noj knigi 2001) (in Russian). 33. Rench T, Konstytutsiia moral’nosti Transtsendental’na antropolohiia i praktychna filosofiia [Constitution of Morality Transcendental Anthropology and Practical Philosophy] (Prykhodko V per, Dukh i litera 2010) (in Ukrainian). 34. Smit A, Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations] (Afanas’ev V per, Jeksmo 2007) (in Russian). Journal articles 35. Alchian A, ‘Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory’ (1950) 58 Journal of Political Economy 211 (in English). 36. Alexander N, ‘The Mediation Metamodel: Understanding Practice’ [2008] 26(1) Conflict Resolution Quarterly 97 (in English). 37. Brunner K, ‘The Perception of Man and the Conception of Society: Two Approaches to Understanding Society’ [1987] 25 Economic Inquiry 367 (in English). 38. Brunner K, Meckling W, ‘The Perception of Man and the Conception of Government’ [1977] 9(1) Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 60 (in English). 39. Brunner K, Meltzer A, ‘The Uses of Money: Money in the Theory of an Exchange Economy’ [1971] 61(5) American Economic Review 784 (in English). 40. Fuller L, ‘Mediation – Its Forms and Functions’ [1970] 44(2) Southern California Law Review 305 (in English). 41. Lindenberg S, ‘An Assessment of the New Political Economy: Its Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in Particular’ [1985] 3(1) Sociological Theory 99 (in English). 42. Marshak J, ‘Elements for a Theory of Teams’ [1955] 1 Management Science 127 (in English). 43. McGuire J, ‘Some Team Models of a Sales Organization’ [1961] 7(1) Management Science 101 (in English). 44. Meckling W, ‘Values and the Choice of the Model of the Individual in the Social Sciences (REMM)’ (1976) 4 Schweizerische Zeitschriftfür Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 545 (in English). 45. Menkel-Meadow C, ‘The Many Ways of Mediation: The Transformation of Traditions, Ideologies, Paradigms, and Practices’ [1995] 11 Negotiation Journal 217 (in English). 46. – –, ‘The Trouble with the Adversary System in a Postmodern, Multicultural World’ [1996] 38 William & Mary Law Review 5 (in English). 47. Milner N, ‘Mediation and Political Theory: A critique of Bush and Folger’ [1996] 21(3) Law & Social Inquiry 737 (in English). 48. Radner R, ‘Application of Linear Programming to Team Decision Problems’ [1959] 5(1) Management Science 143 (in English). 49. – –, ‘Team Decision Problems’ [1962] 33(9) Annals of Mathematical Statistics 857 (in English). 50. Burova L, ‘Pravova pryroda mediatsiinoi uhody’ [‘Legal Nature of the Mediation Agreement’] (2015) 18 Chasopys tsyvilistyky 56 (in Ukrainian). 51. Kyselova T, ‘Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn iz nadannia posluh mediatsii u zarubizhnykh krainakh’ [‘Legal Regulation of Relations of The Provision of Mediation Services in Foreign Countries’] (2011) 11-12 Pravo Ukrainy 225 (in Ukrainian). 52. Vozniuk N, ‘Pryntsypy alternatyvnykh sposobiv vyrishennia hospodarsko-pravovykh sporiv’ [‘Principles of Alternative Ways of Resolving Economic-Legal Disputes’] (2013) 11 Pravo Ukrainy 373 (in Ukrainian).
|
||
|
|||
