Article title Court Decision Review in the Criminal Process of Ukraine as Implementation of the Restitutio in Integrum Principle
Authors
Name of magazine Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version)
Issue 8/2018
Сторінки [123-138]
DOI 10.33498/louu-2018-08-123
Annotation

Having analyzed the provisions of current legislation of Ukraine and foreign countries, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter – the ECHR) and the materials of national court practice, the authors research into the challenging issues of court decision review in the criminal court procedure of Ukraine after an international judicial institution with jurisdiction recognized by Ukraine establishes that there has been a breach by Ukraine of international commitments while the case concerned was adjudicated by court. Within the framework of this research, the authors also focus on certain issues relating to a repeated review of cases in the event the ECHR’s judgment establishes that Ukraine has breached the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its Protocols, in particular: repeated review of cases which materials are lost, and also the issue of indemnification of the damage caused by prolonged detention. The purpose of the article is to obtain new results in the form of scientific conclusions on the specifics of court decision review in the criminal process of Ukraine as the implementation of the restitutio in integrum principle, and to identify the related problems and possible ways of overcoming them, and also to develop the criteria for admissibility of case review in criminal proceedings, with due regard for the standards and requirements of the Council of Europe. With due consideration of the international experience, the ECHR case law and the specifics of national legislation, the authors suggest that Chapter 34 of the CCrP of Ukraine should specify the grounds based on which a court decision may be overturned or modified in case an international judicial institution with jurisdiction recognized by Ukraine establishes that there has been a breach by Ukraine of international commitments while the case concerned was adjudicated by court. Introduction of such filters may ensure implementation of the restitutio in integrum principle, on the one part and, on the other part, may limit the number of applications for review submitted to court in cases where such a measure, being individual by nature, may not and should not be applied. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure protection and reinstatement of breached rights, as well as compliance with the legal certainty principle for participants to legal relations under the law of criminal procedure.

 

Keywords restitutio in integrum principle, execution of the ECHR judgments, court decision review, criminal court procedure, criteria for case review admissibility
References

List of legal documents 
 

Legislation 
1. Criminal Procedure Code of the French Republic (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in English). 
2. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]: vid 04 lystopada 
1950 р. URL: http: //zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/995_004/find?text=restit (accessed: 
09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
3. Pro vykonannia rishen ta zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny[On Execution of Judgments and Application of Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 23 liutoho 2006 р. № 3477-IV. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).

4. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 13 kvitnia 2012 р. № 4651-VI. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/4651-17 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
5. Rekomendatsiia № R (2000) 2 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo povtornoho rozghliadu abo ponovlennia provadzhennia u pevnykh spravakh na natsionalnomu rivni pislia pryiniattia rishen Yevropeiskym sudom z prav liudyny [Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to Member States on the Re-Examination or Reopening of Certain Cases at Domestic Level Following Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights] vid 19 sichnia 2000 r., pryiniata Komitetom ministriv na 694-mu zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv vid 19 sichnia 2000 roku. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_175 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
6. Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 18 bereznia 2004 р. № 1618-ІV. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#n9651 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
7. Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Criminal Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 05 kvitnia 2001 р. № 2341-ІІІ. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/2341-14 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
8. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Civil Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 16 sichnia 2003 р. № 435-ІV. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ main/435-15 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
9. Pro poriadok vidshkoduvannia shkody, zavdanoi hromadianynovi nezakonnymy diiamy orhaniv, shcho zdiisniuiut operatyvno-rozshukovu diialnist, orhaniv dosudovoho rozsliduvannia, prokuratury i sudu [On the Procedure for Indemnification of Damage Caused to a Citizen by Unlawful Actions of Bodies Conducting Operational Investigative Activities, Bodies of Pre-Trial Investigation, Prosecution and Court]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 01 hrudnia 1994 р. № 266/94-ВР. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/266/94-%D0%B2%D1%80 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
10. Polozhennia pro zastosuvannia Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro poriadok vidshkoduvannia shkody, zavdanoi hromadianynovi nezakonnymy diiamy orhaniv diznannia, poperednoho slidstva, prokuratury i sudu” [Regulation on the Application of the Law of Ukraine on the Procedure for Indemnification of Damage Caused to a Citizen by Unlawful Actions of the Bodies of Inquiry, Preliminary Investigation, Prosecution and Court]: Nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii, Heneralnoi prokuratury ta Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy [the order of the Ministry of Justice, the Prosecutor′s Office and the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine] vid 04 bereznia 1996 р. № 6/5/3/41. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/z0106-96 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
11. Ugolovno-processual’nyj kodeks Jestonskoj Respubliki [The Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Estonia], prinjat 12 fevralja 2003 goda (RTI, 203, 27, 166) (neoficial’nyj perevod). URL: https://www.legislationline.org/download/action/ download/id/6463/file/Estonia_CPC_as_of_2005_ru.pdf (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Russian). 
12. Ugolovno-processual’nyj kodeks Grecheskoj Respubliki [The Code of Criminal Procedure of the Hellenic Republic] (per s grech S Karibova i V Karibova) <https:// rostov.rpa-mu.ru/Media/rostov/Obuchauschimsia/uchebnye_posobia/Karibov.pdf> (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
13. Case of Allan v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 48539/99): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 5 November 2002, final 05 February 2003 (in English). 
14. Case of Bochan v. Ukraine (№ 2) (Application no. 22251/08): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 5 February 2015 (in English). 
15. Case of Gurepka v. Ukraine (№ 2) (Application no. 38789/04): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 8 April 2010, final 8 July 2010 (in English). 
16. Case of Khan v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 35394/97): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 12 May 2000, final 04 October 2000 (in English). 
17. Case of Khlebik v. Ukraine (Application no. 2945/16): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 25 July 2017, final11 December 2017 (in English). 
18. Case of Nadtochiy v. Ukraine (Application no. 7460/03): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 15 May 2008, final 15 August 2008 (in English). 
19. Case of Ocalan v. Turkey (Application no. 46221/99): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 12 May 2005 (in English). 
20. Case of P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, (Application no. 44787/98): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 25 September 2001, final 25 December 2001(in English). 
21. Case of Papamichalopoulos and others v. Greece (Application no. 14556/89): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 31 October 1995 (in English). 
22. Case of Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC] (Application nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98):Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 13 July 2000 (in English). 
23. Case of Yaremenko v. Ukraine (№ 2) (Application no. 66338/09): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 30 April 2015, final 30 July 2015 (in English). 
24. Case of Yaremenko v. Ukraine (Application no. 32092/02): Judgment European Court of Human Rights, 12 June 2008, final 12 September 2008 (in English). 
25. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court] vid 20 liutoho 2018 r., sudova sprava № 775/15/15-к. URL: http://www. reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72349249 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
26. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court] vid 27 liutoho 2018., sudova sprava 756/5578/15-к. URL: http://www. reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72489783 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
27. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court] vid 29 bereznia 2018 r., sudova sprava № 2-2119/12. URL: http://www. reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73195064 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
28. Ukhvala Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy [Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine] vid 6 veresnia 2016 r., sudova sprava №5-271кз16. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/61136416 (accessed: 09.09.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
29. Shchorichnyi zvit pro rezultaty diialnosti Upovnovazhenoho u spravakh Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u 2017 rotsi [2017 Annual Activity Report of the Commissioner for the European Court of Human Rights]: Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy [Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine] vid 31 sichnia 2018 roku № 1472/5.2.1/ін.-18 (in Ukrainian). 
 

Bibliography 
 

Authored book 
30. Vidnovlennia sudovoho provadzhennia na pidstavi rishen Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny: meterialy instytutsii ta proektiv Rady Yevropy [Reopening of Court Proceedings Based on Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: Materials of Institutions and Projects of the Council of Europe] (Kyiv: Publikatsiiu pidhotovleno v ramkakh proektu Rady Yevropy “Pidtrymka vprovadzhenniu sudovoi reformy v Ukraini” 2017) (in Ukrainian). 

 

Electronic version Download