Article title |
Can the Scientific and Non-Classical Cognition of Law be Possible?
|
Authors |
Havryliuk R.
|
Name of magazine |
Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version)
|
Issue |
1/2014
|
Сторінки
|
[94-105]
|
Annotation |
The article is a continuation of the analysis, aforementioned on the pages of the legal journal «Law of Ukraine», of the problem of philosophic-methodological selfdetermination of legal science: what must and can it be — science in the literal sense of the word or any other kind of cognition of legal reality? The problem is outlined directly, can the scientific non-classic cognition of law be possible? With this purpose there is given a substance of non-classic standards of the scientism and, therewith, are comprehended the most essential results of non-classic cognition of law by means of cognitive tradition of a regenerated natural law. There is grounded the conclusion that the scientific non-classic cognition of law is possible, while the resume by M. Tarasov «epistemological model of natural-legal cognition cannot be applied to jurisprudence» in the context of non-classic standards of scientism is nonauthentic. |
Keywords |
cientific cognition, classic standards of scientism, non-classic standards of scientism, social nature of law, ontological pluralism of law, a priori law, law with changing content, living law, stable legal range. |
References
|
|
|