The principles of civil court procedure constitute the most generalized and fundamental category of the science of civil procedural law, along with such ones as the goal and objectives of the civil process, the subject matter and the method of civil procedural law, relations under civil procedural law etc. It is symptomatic that intensive studies of these principles were made during the periods involving codifications of the procedural legislation, as well as the post-codification periods. This occurred in the 60s of the past century, and in the 2000s. A rather extensive scope of specialized literature focused on this issue allows getting an idea of the current state of the theory of civil court procedure principles and its practical significance. In this regard, it should be noted that the theoretical concepts underlying the theory of civil procedural law principles way back in the 1960s have remained almost unchanged. At the same time, the constitutional reform implemented in the area of justice and the related institutions laid the foundations for modernization of the civil procedural legislation entailing the adoption of the new version of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine (CCP) which rests upon the general European trends in civil court procedure and the idea of ensuring everyone’s right to a fair trial and access to justice. As one of the most far-reaching consequences of the constitutional reform and the amendments to the civil procedural legislation we should mention the establishment of the new Supreme Court as a court of cassation, which, among other things, is made responsible for ensuring the unity of court practice and, consequently, high standards of justice. Given this, it becomes clear that modern civil court procedure and law application at court should comply with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 (ECHR) and ensure access to justice, and the institutions of justice and court procedure should be improved in line with the challenges of modern society and also with due regard for such an obvious civilizational fact as fundamentalization of human rights and the efficiency of justice. At the same time, there are indications that the civil procedural law doctrine is oblivious to the principles of civil court procedure which are fundamental and determine a certain discourse of scientific research and the dimensions of modern civil court procedure in democratic societies, and which are, in a way, a benchmark of the rule of law. They have a specific legal nature and are regarded as a certain explication of the generally recognized provisions and principles of international law, i.e. imperative provisions of international law which are accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole and which may not be deviated from. They are characterized by a supranational nature and are entrenched in international legal instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. It is also important that these principles are applied in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Therefore, a further development of the theory of civil procedural law principles should be aimed at studying the profound regularities and trends of changes in the qualitative characteristics of legal regulation of civil court procedure, which historically form the foundations of various systems of legal comprehension and predetermine the shaping of a new worldview, i.e. the vision of justice and the functions of courts as bodies of the judicial power which in democratic societies should ensure the priority of human rights, the rule of law, and a new level of legal practice in general. Their further scientific elaboration and implementation into the practice of application at court will contribute to the socialization of the civil process and to the identification through the prism of new social and legal realities of the functioning of justice which are determined by the need for the assurance of human rights and the rule of law. The article studies the legal nature and the catalogue of the fundamental principles of civil court procedure based on the subsidiary importance for law application at court, and offers their phenomenological interpretation.

REFERENCES
List of legal documents
Legislation
1. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. June 1981 <http://www.achpr.org/
instruments/achpr> accessed 16 September 2018 (in English).
2. American Convention on Human Rights. 22 November 1969 <http://www.cidh.org/
Basicos/English/Basic3.American%20Convention.htm> accessed 16 September 2018
(in English).
3. The principle of Rule of Law: Report Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights
<http://assembly.coe.int> accessed 16 September 2018 (in English).
4. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [The Constitution of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of
Ukraine] vid 28 chervnia 1996 r. № 254к/96-ВР. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/
show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 (accessed: 16.11.2018) (in Ukrainian).
5. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [Convention for
the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] 4 lystopada 1950 r.
URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
6. Mizhnarodnyi pakt pro hromadianski i politychni prava [Universal Declaration
of Human Rights] vid 16 grudnia 1966 r. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/
show/995_043 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
7. Pro selianske (fermerske) hospodarstvo [On the Agricultural (Farming) Enterprise]:
Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 20 hrudnia 1991 r. № 2009-XII. URL:
http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2009-12 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
8. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv [On the Judicial System and the Status of Judges]: Zakon
Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 2 chervnia 2016 r. № 1402-VIII. URL: http://zakon.
rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
9. Promezhutochnaja Rezoljucija ResDH(2006)1, kasajushhajasja narushenij principa
pravovoj opredelennosti nadzornym proizvodstvom v grazhdanskom processe v
Rossijskoj Federacii – obshhie mery i nerazreshennye voprosy (Prinjata Komitetom
ministrov 8 fevralja 2006 g. na 955-m zasedanii zamestitelej Ministrov) [Interim
Resolution ResDH (2006)1 Concerning the Violations of the Legal Certainty Principle
Through the Supervisory Review Procedure in Civil Proceedings in the Russian
Federation – General Measures Adopted and Outstanding Issues (Adopted by the
Committee of Ministers on February 8, 2006 at the 955th Meeting of Deputy Ministers)]
<http://sutyajnik.ru/rus/echr/res_com_of_min/ResDH(2006)1.htm> accessed 16 Septem
ber 2018 (in Russian).
10. Protokol do Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [Protocol
to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]
vid 20 bereznia 1952 r. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_535/card2#Card
(accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
11. Statut Rady Yevropy [The Charter of the Council of Europe] vid 5 travnia 1949 r. URL:
http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_001 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
12. Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Civil Procedural Law of Ukraine]: V redaktsii
Zakonu Ukrainy vid 3 zovtnia 2017 r. № 2147-VIII. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/
laws/show/1618-15 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
13. Zahalna deklaratsiia prav liudyny [Universal Declaration of Human Rights] vid
10 grudnia 1948 r. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015 (accessed:
16.11.2018) (in Ukrainian).
14. Zemelnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Land Code of Ukraine]: V redaktsii Zakonu Ukrainy
vid 13 bereznia 1992 r. № 2196-XII URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/561-12/
ed20031015 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
Cases
15. Amuur v. France, no. 19776/92, par. 50, ECHR 1996-III (in English).
16. Atanasovski v. the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 36815/03, § 38, 14
January 2010 (in English).
17. Brumarescu v. Romania, no. 28342/95, par. 61, ECHR 1999-VII (in English).
18. Burmych and others v. Ukraine, 12 October 2017, Reports of Judgments and Decisions
2017 (extracts) (in English).
19. Cordova v. Italy (№ 1), no. 40877/98, par. 52, ECHR 2003-I (in English).
20. Faimblat v. Romania, no. 23066/02, par. 28, ECHR 2009 (in English).
21. Golder v. UK, 21 February 1975, par. 35, Series A no.18 (in English).
22. Ielo v. Italy, no. 23053/02, par. 44, 06 December 2005 (in English).
23. Iordan Iordanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 23530/02, § 49, 2 July 2009 (in English).
24. Pullar v. UK, no. 22399/93, par. 32, ECHR 1996-II (in English).
25. Santos Pinto v. Portugal, no. 39005/04, § 41, 20 May 2008 (in English).
26. Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, ECHR 2002-VII (in English).
27. Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 09 December 1994, par. 49,
Series A no. 301-B (in English).
28. Sutyazhnik v. Russia, app. 8269/02 <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93775>
accessed 16 September 2018 (in English).
29. Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, par. 91, 09 November 2004 (in English).
30. Unėdic v. France, no. 20153/04, § 74, 18 December 2008 (in English).
31. Waite and Kennedy v. Germany, no. 26083/94, par. 58, ECHR 1999-I (in English).
32. Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, 15 October 2009 (in English).
33. Zhovner v. Ukraine, no. 56848/00, 29 June 2004 (in English).
34. Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the
Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court] vid 20 chervnia 2018 r. u spravi
№ 756/552/17. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74963689 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
35. Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the
Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court] vid 6 chervnia 2018 r. u spravi
№ 523/4454/16-ц. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74687846 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
36. Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of
the Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court] vid 19 chervnia 2018 r. u
spravi № 438/592/17. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75498143 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
37. Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the
Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court] vid 4 kvitnia 2018 r. u spravi
№ 212/2362/16-ц. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73408624 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
38. Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of
the Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court] vid 12 veresnia 2018 r. u
spravi № 752/1016/17. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76566295 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
39. Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the
Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court] vid 18 kvitnia 2018 r. u spravi
№ 753/11000/14-ts. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73500675 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
40. Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the
Civil Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court] vid 17 zovtnia 2018 r. u spravi
№ 681/203/17-ts. URL: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/77455891 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
41. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Grand Chamber of the
Supreme Court] vid 4 lypnia 2018 r. u spravi № 653/1096/16-ts. URL: http://reyestr.
court.gov.ua/Review/75296538 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
42. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Grand Chamber of the
Supreme Court] vid 15 travnia 2018 r. u spravi № 372/2180/15-ts. URL: http://reyestr.
court.gov.ua/Review/75287005 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
43. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Grand Chamber of the
Supreme Court] vid 21 bereznia 2018 u spravi № 235/3619/15-ts. URL: http://reyestr.
court.gov.ua/Review/73500804 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
44. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Grand Chamber of the
Supreme Court] vid 21 bereznia 2018 r. u spravi № 235/3619/15-ts. URL: http://reyestr.
court.gov.ua/Review/73500804 (accessed: 16.90.2018) (in Ukrainian).
45. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Grand Chamber of the
Supreme Court] vid 21 serpnia 2018 r. u spravi № 761/35639/15-ts. URL: http://reyestr.
court.gov.ua/Review/76290815 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
46. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Grand Chamber of the
Supreme Court] vid 31 zovtnia 2018 r. u spravi № 753/12729/15-ts. URL: http://reyestr.
court.gov.ua/Review/77696631 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
47. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Grand Chamber of the
Supreme Court] vid 4 lypnia 2018 roku u spravi № 623/3792/15-ts. URL: http://reyestr.
court.gov.ua/Review/75149540 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
48. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu [Decree of the Supreme Court] vid 8 serpnia 2018 r. u
spravi № 199/5595/14-ts URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75793882 (accessed:
16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
49. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam
52 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy
(konstytutsiinosti) Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro osoblyvosti zvilnennia z posad osib, yaki
sumishchaiut deputatskyi mandat z inshymy vydamy diialnosti” ta konstytutsiinym
podanniam 89 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy pro ofitsiine tlumachennia polozhen
punktu 2 chastyny druhoi statti 90 Konstytutsii Ukrainy, statti 5 Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro
osoblyvosti zvilnennia z posad osib, yaki sumishchaiut deputatskyi mandat z inshymy
vydamy diialnosti” (sprava pro zvilnennia narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy z inshykh
posad u razi sumishchennia) [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the
Case Following the Constitutional Application of 52 People’s Deputies of Ukraine
Concerning the Compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (Constitutionality) of
the Law of Ukraine “On the Specifics of Dismissal of Persons Combining the Deputy’s
Mandate with Other Activities” and the Constitutional Application of 89 People’s
Deputies of Ukraine on the Official Interpretation of the Provisions of Clause 2, Part
Two, Article 90 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Article 5 of the Law of Ukraine “On
the Specifics of Dismissal of Persons Combining the Deputy’s Mandate with Other
Activities” (Case of Dismissal of People’s Deputies of Ukraine from Other Positions in
Case of Combination of Jobs)] vid 29 sicnia 2008 r. № 2-рп/2008. URL: http://zakon.
rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v002p710-08 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
50. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam
51 narodnoho deputata Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy
(konstytutsiinosti) polozhen statti 92, punktu 6 rozdilu X “Perekhidni polozhennia”
Zemelnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro postiine korystuvannia zemelnymy
diliankamy) [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the Case Following
the Constitutional Application of 51 People’s Deputies of Ukraine Concerning the
Compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (Constitutionality) of the Provisions of
Article 92, Clause 6 of Section X “Transitional Provisions” of the Land Code of Ukraine
(Case of Permanent Use of Land Plots)] vid 22 veresnia 2005 r. № 5-рп/2005. URL:
http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v005p710-05 (accessed: 16.09.2018) (in Ukrainian).
Bibliography
Authored books
51. Sime S, A practical approach civil procedure (Oxford University Press 2005) (in English).
52. Tamanaha B, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Press Syndicate of the
University of Cambridge 2004) (in English).
53. Chechina N, Principy grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i
praktiki grazhdanskogo processa [Principles of Civil Procedural Law. Topical Issues of the
Civil Process Theory and Practice] (1979) (in Russian).
54. Elyseikyn P, Predmet y pryntsypy sovetskoho hrazhdanskoho protsessualnoho prava
[Subject Matter and Principles of the Soviet Civil Procedural Law] (Iaroslavl 1974)
(in Russian).
55. Holovatyi S, Verkhovenstvo prava [Rule of Law], book 3 (Feniks 2006) (in Ukrainian).
56. Lukashuk I, Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’ [International Law. General Part]
(Volters Kluver 2005) (in Russian).
57. Marochkin S, Dejstvie norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoj sisteme Rossii
[The Effect of International Law in the Russian Legal System] (Tjumen’ 1998) (in Russian).
58. Pokrovskij I, Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [Major Issues of Civil Law] (Statut
1998) (in Russian).
59. Rabinovych P, Prava liudyny i hromadianyna u Konstytutsii Ukrainy (do interpretatsii
vykhidnykh konstytutsiinykh polozhen) [Human and Citizen’s Rights in the Constitution
of Ukraine (on the Interpretation of the Initial Constitutional Provisions)] (Pravo 1997)
(in Ukrainian).
60. Sakara N, Problema dostupnosti pravosuddia u tsyvilnykh spravakh [Issue of Access to
Justice in Civil Cases] (Pravo 2010) (in Ukrainian).
61. Semenov V, Konstytutsyonnye pryntsypy hrazhdanskoho sudoproyzvodstva [Constitutional
Principles of the Civil Court Procedure] (Iurydicheskaya lyteretura 1982) (in Russian).
62. Tkachuk O, Problemy realizatsii sudovoi vlady u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi [Problems
of the Implementation of Judicial Power in Civil Legal Proceedings] (Pravo 2016)
(in Ukrainian).
63. Tsuvina T, Pravo na sud u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi [Right to Trial in Civil Court
Procedure] (Slovo 2015) (in Ukrainian).
Edited books
64. Civil Litigation (Oxford University Press 2005) (in English).
65. Arbitrazhnyj processual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii: osmyslenie praktiki i ee vozmozhnye
korrektivy [The Code of Arbitration Procedure of the Russian Federation: Understanding
of Practice and Possible Adjustments Thereof] (Vikor-Media 2006) (in Russian).
66. Komarov V (red), Tsyvilne protsesualne pravo Ukrainy [Civil Procedural Law of Ukraine]
(Pravo 1999) (in Ukrainian).
67. Pohrebniak S, Osnovopolozhni pryntsypy prava (zmistovna kharakterystyka) [Fundamental
Principles of Law (Substantive Characteristics)] (Pravo 2008) (in Ukrainian).
68. Tertyshnikov V, Tsyvilnyi protses Ukrainy (lektsii) [Civil Process of Ukraine (Lectures)]
(Vyd. SPD FO Vapniarchuk N. M. 2011) (in Ukrainian).
69. Treushnikov M i Cheshka Z (red), Osnovnye principy grazhdanskogo processa [Basic
Principles of the Civil Process] (1991) (in Russian).
Journal articles
70. Craig P, ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical
Framework’ (Autumn, 1997) Public Law 467-487 (in English).
71. Kerameus K, ‘The Marcel – Storme – Chair for International and Comparative Civil
Procedure at Ghent University – A Note’ (2006) 4 European Review of Private Law
619-620 (in English).
72. Kono T, ‘Recent Trends in Japanese Civil Procedure Reform of the Code of Civil
Procedure’ [2000] 2(1) European Journal of Law Reform 155-164 (in English).
73. Resnik J, ‘Procedure’s Projects’ (2004) 23 Civil Justice Quarterly 286-9 (in English).
74. Rozakis C, ‘Right to a Fair Trial in Civil Cases’ (2004) 4 Judicial Studies Institute Journal
96-106 (in English).
75. Stigal D, ‘The Rule of Law: a Primer and Proposal’ (2006) 189 Military Law Review
92-111 (in English).
76. Storme M, ‘A Single Civil procedure for Europe: A Cathedral Builders’ Dream’ (2005)
22 Ritsumeikan Law Review 96-9 (in English).
77. Summers R, ‘A Formal Theory of the Rule of Law’ [1993] 6(2) Ratio Juris 127
(in English).
78. Zuckerman A, ‘Reforming civil justice system: trends in industrial countries’ (2000) 46
PREMnote (in English).
79. Bonner A, ‘K voprosu o principah grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava’ [‘On the Issue
of Principles of Civil Procedural Law’] (1975) 38 Trudy VJuZI (in Russian).
80. Demichev A, ‘K voprosu o principah grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava’ [‘On the
Issue of the Principles of Civil Procedure Law’] [2005] 1(42) Vestn. Sarat. gos. akad.
prava 95 (in Russian).
81. Demichev A, ‘Pozitivistskaja klassifikacija principov grazhdanskogo processual’nogo
prava Rossijskoj Federacii’ [‘Positivist Classification of the Civil Procedural Law
Principles of the Russian Federation’] (2005) 7 Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process 5-10
(in Russian).
82. Gurvich M, ‘Principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava’ [‘Principles of
the Soviet Civil Procedural Law’] (1965) 3 Trudy VJuZI (in Russian).
83. Hetmantsev O ta Patsurkivskyi P, ‘Poniattia pryntsypiv tsyvilnoho protsesu ta yikh
znachennia u pravozastosovchii diialnosti sudu’ [‘The Concept of the Principles of the
Civil Process and their Significance in the Law Enforcement Activities of the Court’]
(2003) 187 Nauk. visn. Chernivets. un-tu. 60-5 (in Ukrainian).
84. Hetmantsev O, ‘Spivvidnoshennia aksiom i pryntsypiv v tsyvilnomu protsesi Ukrainy’
[‘Correlation of Axioms and Principles in the Civil Process of Ukraine’] (2003) 200
Nauk. visn. Cherniv. un-tu. Pravoznavstvo 51-4 (in Ukrainian).
85. Koziubra M, ‘Pryntsyp verkhovenstva prava i konstytutsiina yurysdyktsiia’ [‘The Rule
of Law Principle and Constitutional Jurisdiction’] (2000) 4 Visnyk Konstytutsiinoho
Sudu Ukrainy 30 (in Ukrainian).
86. Lukaides L, ‘Princip verhovenstva prava i prava cheloveka: S osobym uchetom
precedentnoj praktiki Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka’ [‘The Rule of Law and
Human Rights Principle: with Particular Reference to the Case Law of the European
Court of Human Rights’] (2006) 4 Prava cheloveka 25-34 (in Russian).
87. Luspenyk D, ‘Verkhovenstvo prava – “novyi” staryi pryntsyp tsyvilnoho sudochynstva:
spivvidnoshennia iz pryntsypom zakonnosti’ [‘Rule of Law – the “New” Old Principle
of Civil Court Procedure: Correlation with the Legality Principle’] (2017) 8 Pravo
Ukrainy 9-20 (in Ukrainian).
88. Manukjan V, ‘Princip H’juarta: neobhodima li nam processual’naja spravedlivost’?’
[‘Hughart’s Principle: Do We Need Procedural Justice?’] (2007) 5 Jurid. praktika 12-3
(in Russian).
89. Opanasenko O, ‘Poniattia pryntsypu zmahalnosti v tsyvilnomu protsesi Ukrainy’ [‘The
Concept of the Adversarial Principle in the Civil Process of Ukraine’] (2007) 4 Pravo
viiskovoi sfery 25-6 (in Ukrainian).
90. Rabinovych P, ‘Verkhovenstvo prava (za materialamy praktyky Strasburzkoho sudu ta
Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy)’ [‘Rule of Law (Based on the Materials of the Case
Law of the Strasbourg Court and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine)’] [2006] 2(45)
Visn. Akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy 3-21 (in Ukrainian).
91. Shyshkin V, ‘Pryntsyp dyspozytyvnosti u novomu TsPK Ukrainy’ [‘Principle of
discretion in the new CPC of Ukraine’] (2006) 3 Pravo Ukrainy 78-81 (in Ukrainian).
92. Tsuvina T, ‘Pryntsyp verkhovenstva prava ta pravo na sud’ [‘Rule of Law and the Right
to Trial’] (2012) 12 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo, pravo (in Ukrainian).
93. Varlamova N, ‘Verhovenstvo pravo – bazovyj princip evropejskoj sistemy zashhity
prav cheloveka’ [‘Rule of Law – the Basic Principle of the European System of Human
Rights’] [2002] 3(41) Konstitucionnoe pravo: Vostochno-evropejskoe obozrenie 161
(in Russian).
94. Volosenko S, ‘Pryntsyp zmahalnosti u novelakh TsPK’ [‘The Adversarial Principle in the
Novels of the CCP’] (2007) 1 Chasop. Kyiv. un-tu prava 132-6 (in Ukrainian).
95. Vovk D, ‘Problemy vyznachennia ta dii pryntsypu verkhovenstva prava v Ukraini’
[‘Issues of Definition and Operation of the Rule of Law in Ukraine’] (2003) 11 Pravo
Ukrainy 127-130 (in Ukrainian).
96. Yasynok M, ‘Chy ye pryntsyp zmahalnosti v okremomu provadzhenni?’ [‘Is the
Adversarial Principle Available in Separate Proceeding?’] (2006) 34 Visn. Nats. un-tu
vnutr. sprav 287-292 (in Ukrainian).
Thesis
97. Bukina V, ‘Principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava (teoreticheskie
voprosy, ponjatija i sistemy)’ [‘Principles of the Soviet Civil Procedural Law (Theoretical
Issues, Concepts and Systems)’] (avtoref dis kand jurid nauk, 1975) (in Russian).
98. Semenov V, ‘Principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava’ [‘Principles of
the Soviet Civil Procedural Law’] (avtoref dis d-ra jurid nauk, 1965) (in Russian)