Responsive image
Article On Property Liability of Legal Entities for Obligations of the State
Authors
INNA SPASYBO-FATYEYEVA

Doctor in law, Professor, Corresponding member of the Legal science Academy, Honored member of science and technology, Professor of civil law Department № 1 National law University named after Yaroslav Mydriy (Kharkiv, Ukrainе) ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-3447-1252 isfateeva@gmail.com

 

Name of magazine Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version)
Issue 1 / 2019
Pages 204 - 216
Annotation

Issues pertaining to liability of legal entities at the expense of their assets and recovery of debts of their founders against assets of legal entities are in the focus of attention of researchers and experts, since along with having a direct reference to the property status of a legal entity, its members and creditors, they also affect civil commerce as a whole. One of the most important aspects of this scope of issues is liability of legal entities in which the State owns an interest in the authorized capital, or shares, or even some assets. In particular, this is a question whether it is admissible to seek recovery for obligations of a legal entity’s owner at the expense of assets of the legal entity if its assets are in the State’s or municipal ownership, that is, where the owner is the State or a territorial community. This question becomes particularly pressing if the owner of assets of a legal entity or an interest in its authorized capital or shares (particularly, if they constitute 100 % of the authorized capital) is a foreign State. These issues arose with respect to liability of Ukrainian legal entities to foreign investors at the expense of the former’s assets, as well as liability of a foreign State at the expense of its assets for obligations of legal entities registered in Ukraine. At the same time, one of the stumbling points is independent liability at the expense of assets as one of the features of legal liability. The purpose of the article is to clarify whether it is possible or inadmissible to seek recovery at the expense of assets of the members (founders, shareholders) of a legal entity, given its rights to its assets and the rights of its members (founders, shareholders) to such assets, the grounds for civil liability and also given the inconsistency of legislative regulation of this issue in Ukraine. This is important in theoretical as well as in practical terms. As a result of the study, the author revealed obvious shortcomings in the legislative regulation of property rights of the State as the founder of a legal entity and the rights of a legal entity to its assets, especially if such rights are that of economic management and operational control, as well as the rights to assets of business companies with 100% of their authorized capital or shares owned by the State (state-owned or national companies or corporations). Accordingly, this predetermines the answer to the above question whether it is possible to make legal entities liable for obligations of their founders, and vice versa. The following conclusions are made: a) there is a need to amend the legislation of Ukraine not only with regard to the rights to assets of state-owned and municipal enterprises and institutions, but to their organizational and legal form in general; b) consistency of compliance with the principle of non-liability of legal entity members for debts of respective legal entities, and vice versa – non-liability of legal entities for debts of their members, except where these persons are made liable by a court decision when the unfairness of their actions is established.

 

Keywords property liability; member (founder, shareholder) of a legal entity; right to property; ownership right
References

List of legal documents 

Legislation 
1. Hospodarskyi kodeks Ukrainy [Economic Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] 16 sichnia 2003 r. № 436-IV (accessed: 12.12.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
2. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine]vid 28 chervnia 1996 r. № 254k/96-VR (accessed: 12.12.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
3. O banke razvitija [On the Development Bank]: Federal’nyj zakon Rossijskoj Federacii [Federal Law of the Russian Federation] ot 17 maja 2007 g. № 82-FZ (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Russian). 
4. O nekommercheskih organizacijah [On Non-Profit Organizations]: Federal’nyj zakon Rossijskoj Federacii [the Federal Law of Russian Federation] ot 12 janvarja 1996 g. № 7-FZ <http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102039064> (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Russian).
5. Pro aktsionerni tovarystva [On Joint Stock Companies]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 17 veresnia 2008 r. № 514-VI (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
6. Pro banky ta bankivsku diialnist [On Banks and Banking]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 7 hrudnia 2000 r. № 2121-III (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
7. Pro rezhym inozemnoho investuvannia [On the Regime of Foreign Investment]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 19 bereznia 1996 r. № 93/96-VR. (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Ukrainian).
8. Pro vykonavche provadzhennia [On Enforcement Proceedings]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 2 chervnia 2016 r. № 1404-VIII (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
9. Protokol do Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] vid 17 lypnia 1997 r.(accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Ukrainian). 
10. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Civil Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy [the Law of Ukraine] vid 16 sichnia 2003 r. № 435-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2003. № 40-44. St. 356 (in Ukrainian). 

Cases 
11. Grigor’ev i Kakaurova protiv Rossijskoj Federacii (Grigoryev and Kakaurova v. Russia) [Grigoryev and Kakaurova v. Russia]: postanovlenie Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights] ot 12 aprelja 2007 g. 13820/04 (2008) 8 Bjuleten’ Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka 85-92 (in Russian). 
12. Klecova protiv Rossijskoj Federacii (Kletsova v. Russia) [Kletsova v. Russia]: postanovlenie Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights] ot 12 aprelja 2007 g. 24842/04 (2008) 10 Bjuleten’ Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka 80-8 (in Russian). 
13. Ukhvala Apeliatsiinoho sudu m. Kyieva [Award of the Appeal Court of Kyiv City] vid 5 veresnia 2018 r. u spravi № 796/165/2018 (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Ukrainian). 

Bibliography 

Authored books 
14. Rotan V (vidp red), Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do tsyvilnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy [Scientific and Practical Commentary to Civil Legislation of Ukraine], t 1 (Instytut yurydychnykh doslidzhen 2000) (in Ukrainian). 

Websites 
15. ‘ANTK im. O. K. Antonova otozval svoj isk’ [‘O. K. Antonov Company Withdrew its Lawsuit’] (Vechernij Har’kov, 5 december 2005) (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Russian). 
16. ‘Ukrainski kompanii vyhraly sud u Haazi shchodo kompensatsii Rosiieiu zbytkiv za aneksiiu Krymu’ [‘‘Ukrainian Companies Won the Hague Court Case for Compensation by Russia of the Damage Caused by Annexation of Crimea’] (Unian, 10 may 2018) (accessed: 13.11.2018) (in Ukrainian)

Electronic version Download