The administrative-law nature of private ownership alienation for the social needs and on the grounds of social necessity has been recognized by national and European scholars completely or partially (in cases of justification of a mixed legal nature) for a long time – since pre-revolutionary times till present. However, by now, there has been no administrative-law research of private ownership alienation for the social needs and on the grounds of social necessity, both in Ukraine and in the post-Soviet countries. Instead, administrative-law relations arising in this area (in particular, procedures for adoption of administrative acts) are studied within the framework of private-law research. Such a situation with scientific developments on these issues is surprising and requires an explanation which, however, has not been provided. The need to clarify the reasons entailing this situation becomes even more justified given the prompt development of modern administrative law of Ukraine, expansion of its subject matter and system, participants to administrative-law relations and tools of public administration which give the chance to reconsider the settled views, concepts, statutory concepts, etc.

The purpose of the article is to detect the reasons for the lack of administrative-law research into the issues relating to private ownership alienation for the social needs and on the grounds of social necessity.

The author has established that the following main reasons determine why there are no administrative-law studies of the issues relating to private ownership alienation for the social needs and on the grounds of social necessity: 1) historical circumstances that created obstacles to the development of administrative-law research into this area of legal relations: late beginning of the establishment and development of administrative law, the October revolution and other events occurring after it, ascension of Soviet power and the ideology imposed by it – those factors in total hindered the development of national administrative law along the path taken by Western European law; 2) development of national legal science towards abandonment and denial of the Soviet ideology and the results of scientific research compliant therewith, and this most likely prompted researchers to formulate the approaches directly opposite to the Soviet ones and led to the dominance of the privatelaw concept of understanding private ownership alienation for the social needs and on the grounds of social necessity.

The author established that today’s practice of the European States, national and foreign historical experience, and the generally recognized public-law nature of private ownership alienation for the social needs and on the grounds of social necessity (completely or partially) indicate that: 1) there is no valid reason why these studies should not be made in the future; 2) it is expedient to make such studies because to some extent this is a standard in well-developed European countries, and besides, this was what our country sought for all the time but could not implement as a result of the mentioned circumstances.

Bibliography

Authored books

1. Fleiner F, Institutionen des Deutschen Verwaltungsrechts (3te Anf, Verlag von J C B Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1913) (in German).

2. Mayer O, Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, bd 1 (Duncker und Humblot 1895) (in German). 3. Mayer O, Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht, bd 2 (Duncker und Humblot 1896) (in German).

4. Roesler H, Lehrbuch des Deutschen Verwaltungsrecht (Verlag von Andreas Deichert 1872) (in German).

5. Stein L von, Handbuch der Verwaltungslehre und des Verwaltungsrechts: mit Vergleichung der Literatur und Gesetzgebung von Frankreich, England und Deutschland (Cotta 1870) (in German). 6. Wille H, Liechtensteinisches Verwaltungsrecht. Ausgewählte Gebiete (Verlag der Liechtensteinischen Akademischen Gesellschaft 2004) (in German).

7. Vas’kovskij E, Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook оf Civil Law], vyp ІІ: Veshhnoe pravo [Property Law] (Izdanie juridicheskogo knizhnogo magazina N K Martynova 1896) (in Russian). 8. Gambarov Ju, Kurs grazhdanskogo prava: Chast’ obshhaja [The Course оf Civil Law: General Part], t І (Tipografija M M Stasjulevicha 1911) (in Russian).

9. Evtihiev A, Osnovy sovetskogo administrativnogo prava [The Basics оf Soviet Administrative Law] (Juridicheskoe izdatel’stvo NKJu USSR 1925) (in Russian).

10. Klymenko O, Spivvidnoshennia publichnoho ta pryvatnoho interesiv u aspekti prymusovoho vidchuzhennia ob’iektiv prava pryvatnoi vlasnosti, zumovlenoho suspilnoiu neobkhidnistiu (konstytutsiino-pravovyi analiz) [Value of Public And Private Interests in the Aspect of Forced Alienation of Objects of Private Property Rights, Determined by Social Necessity (Constitutional and Legal Analysis)] (Instytut zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy 2011) (in Ukrainian).

11. Kobalevskij V, Ocherki sovetskogo administrativnogo prava [Essays оn Soviet Administrative Law] (Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo Ukrainy 1924) (in Russian).

12. Kozlov Ju, Osnovy sovetskogo administrativnogo prava [The Basics оf Soviet Administrative Law] (Znanie 1975) (in Russian).

13. Kozlov Ju, Osnovy sovetskogo administrativnogo prava [The Basics оf Soviet Administrative Law] (2-e izd, Znanie 1979) (in Russian).

14. Pakhomov I, Radianske administratyvne pravo. Zahalna chastyna [Soviet Administrative Law. General Part] (Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoho universytetu 1962) (in Ukrainian).

15. Sinajskij V, Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Obshhaja chast’. Veshhnoe pravo. Avtorskoe pravo [Russian Civil Law: General Part. Property Law. Copyright Law], vyp 1 (2-e izd, Tipo-Litografija Progress 1917) (in Russian).

16. Studenikin S, Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo [Soviet Administrative Law] (Juridicheskoe izdatel’stvo NKJu SSSR 1945) (in Russian).

17. Studenikin S, Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo [Soviet Administrative Law] (Gosjurizdat 1949) (in Russian).

18. Studenikin S i Evtihiev I i Vlasov V, Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo [Soviet Administrative Law] (Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo juridicheskoj literatury 1950) (in Russian).

19. Stuchka P, Kurs sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava: Osobennaja chast’ grazhdanskogo prava [The Course of Soviet Civil Law: The Special Part of Civil Law], t 3 (Gosudarstvennoe social’no-jekonomicheskoe izdatel’stvo 1931) (in Russian).

20. Tjutrjumov I, Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law] (Tipografija K Mattisena 1922) (in Russian).

Edited and translated books

21. Andorkó I, ‘The History of Hungarian Expropriation Law’ in Hoops B and others (eds), Rethinking Expropriation Law Ii: Context, Criteria, And Consequences Of Expropriation (Eleven International Publishing 2015) (in English).

22. Ageenkova G i drugie, Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo [Soviet Administrative Law] (Vasilenkov P red, Juridicheskaja literatura 1990) (in Russian).

23. Alehin A i drugie, Administrativnoe pravo (Obshhaja i Osobennaja chasti) [Administrative Law (General And Special Parts)] (Ju Kozlov red, Juridicheskaja literatura 1968) (in Russian).

24. Brjeban G, Francuzskoe administrativnoe pravo [French Administrative Law] (Vasil’ev D i Karpovich V per, Bobotov S red, Progress 1988) (in Russian).

25. Genkin D i dr, Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Soviet Civil Law], t 1 (Genkin D red, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo juridicheskoj literatury 1950) (in Russian).

26. Kampo V ta Nyzhnyk N ta Shloer B, Stanovlennia novoho administratyvnoho prava Ukrainy [Formation of a New Administrative Law of Ukraine] (Kampo V red, Iurydychna knyha 2000) (in Ukrainian).

27. Levitskij V, ‘Predmet, zadacha i metod nauki policejskogo prava’ [‘The Subject, Task and Method of the Science of Police Law’] v Rymarenko Yu, Aver’ianov V ta Usenko I (uporiad), Antolohiia ukrainskoi yurydychnoi dumky: Politseiske ta administratyvne pravo [Anthology of Ukrainian Legal Thought: Police and Administrative Law], t 5 (Rymarenko Iu ta Aver’ianov V vidp red, Iurydychna knyha 2003) (in Russian).

28. Tarasov I, ‘Osnovnye polozhenija Lorenca Shtejna po policejskomu pravu’ [Lorentz Stein’s Basic Provisions On Police Law’] v Hrytsenko I ta Korotkyi V (ukl), Politseiske pravo v Universyteti Sviatoho Volodymyra [Police Law in the University of St. Volodymyr], kn 2 (Hrytsenko I red, Lybid 2010) (in Russian).

29. Vedel’ Zh, Administrativnoe pravo Francii [Administrative Law of France] (Jentin L per, Krutogolov M red, Progress 1973) (in Russian).

30. Vil’njanskij S i drugie, Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Soviet Administrative Law] (Vil’njanskij S red, Juridicheskoe izdatel’stvo NKJu SSSR 1940) (in Russian).

Encyclopedias

31. Reient O, ‘Zhovtnevyi perevorot u petrohradi 1917’ [‘October Revolution in Petrograd 1917’] v Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy [Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History], t 3 (2005) (in Ukrainian).

Journal articles

32. Aliieva-Baranovska V, ‘Korotka istoriia tsyvilnykh kodeksiv Ukrainy’ [‘A Brief History of the Civil Codes of Ukraine’] (2015) 3 Yurydychna Ukraina 4 (in Ukrainian).

33. Holovnia I, ‘Poniattia ta pravova pryroda vidchuzhennia zemelnykh dilianok dlia suspilnykh potreb chy z motyviv suspilnoi neobkhidnosti’ [‘The Concept and Legal Nature of the Alienation of Land for Public Needs or the Motives of Social Necessity’] [2015] 2(17) Molodyi vchenyi 229 (in Ukrainian).

34. Makarchuk N, ‘Formy prinuditel’nogo otchuzhdenija imushhestva dlja gosudarstvennyh nuzhd i ih mesto v sisteme osnovanij prinuditel’nogo prekrashhenija prava sobstvennosti’ [‘Forms of Forced Alienation of Property for State Needs and Their Place in the System of Grounds for the Forced Termination of Property Rights’] (2007) 115 Pravo i zhizn’ 25 (in Russian).

35. Suietnov Ye, ‘Rozvytok instytutu vyluchennia zemel dlia derzhavnykh abo hromadskykh potreb u radianskomu zemelnomu zakonodavstvi’ [‘The Development of the Institute for the Removal of Land for State or Public Needs in Soviet Land Legislation’] [2013] 16(1082) Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina, seriia “Pravo” 44 (in Ukrainian).

36. Suietnov Ye, ‘Iurydychna pryroda uhody, shcho ukladaietsia pid chas vykupu zemelnoi dilianky ta rozmishchenoho na nii nerukhomoho maina dlia suspilnykh potreb’ [‘The Legal Nature of the Agreement Which is Concluded During the Purchase of the Land and Immovable Property Located on it for Public Needs’] [2013] 23(2, 2) Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, seriia “Pravo” 63 (in Ukrainian).

37. Trotska M, ‘Analiz okremykh pidstav vynyknennia prava komunalnoi vlasnosti na pryrodni resursy’ [‘The Analysis of the Separate Grounds for the Emergence of the Right of Communal Ownership of Natural Resources’] (2018) 3 Forum prava 113 (in Ukrainian).

Conference papers

38. Suietnov Ye, ‘Iurydychna pryroda instytutu vidchuzhennia zemelnykh dilianok i rozmishchenykh na nykh nerukhomykh ob’iektiv dlia suspilnykh potreb ta z motyviv suspilnoi neobkhidnosti’ [‘The Legal Nature of the Institute of Alienation of Land Plots and Immovable Objects Located on Them for Public Needs and Reasons of Social Necessity’] v Pravova doktryna – osnova formuvannia pravovoi systemy derzhavy: materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, prysviachenoi 20-richchiu NAPrN Ukrainy ta obhovorenniu piatytomnoi monohrafii “Pravova doktryna Ukrainy” [The Legal Doctrine is the Basis of the Formation of the Legal System of the State: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Devoted to the 20th Anniversary of the Five-Volume Monograph “The Legal Doctrine of Ukraine”] (Pravo 2013) (in Ukrainian).

Thesis

39. Afanas’eva E, ‘Rekvizicija: grazhdansko-pravovoj aspekt’ [‘Requisitions: Civil-Legal Aspect’] (avtoref diss kand jurid nauk, 2009) (in Russian).

40. Makarchuk N, ‘Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie porjadka prinuditel’nogo otchuzhdenija imushhestva dlja gosudarstvennyh i municipal’nyh nuzhd v Rossijskoj Federacii’ [‘Administrative Legal Regulation of the Procedure for the Forced Alienation of Property for State and Municipal Needs in the Russian Federation’] (avtoref diss kand jurid nauk, 2007) (in Russian).

Dissertations

41. Holovnia I, ‘Vidchuzhennia zemelnykh dilianok dlia suspilnykh potreb chy z motyviv suspilnoi neobkhidnosti yak pidstava prypynennia prava vlasnosti na zemelnu dilianku’ [‘Alienation of Land Plots for Public Needs or Reasons of Public Necessity as a Ground for Termination of Ownership of a Land Plot’] (dys kand yuryd nauk, 2015) (in Ukrainian).

42. Hrytsenko I, ‘Stanovlennia i rozvytok naukovykh pohliadiv na osnovni instytuty vitchyznianoho administratyvnoho prava’ [‘Formation and Development of Scientific Views on the Main Institutes of Domestic Administrative Law’] (dys d-ra yuryd nauk, 2008) (in Ukrainian).