The aim of this study is to provide the grounds for recognizing cameralistics as one of major factors in the genesis of modern administrative law, particularly, of its part relating to administration in economic areas, through establishing the presence orabsence of a correlation dependence between cameralistic relations of XV–XIX centuries and today’s administrative law relations.

The article examines the correlation dependence between cameralistic relations, the signs of which are found in the capitularies of Charlemagne and which infiltrated into the practice of administration as long ago as in 1439, and today’s administrative law relations. The article provides substantiation for recognizing of cameralistics as one of major factors in the genesis of administrative law.

The academic novelty lies in proving the evolutionary connection between the disparate recommendations on economic management of the early cameralism period, theoretical knowledge on the arrangement of the economic component of State-building in the XIX century, and their transformation into a sub-branch of modern administrative law. The author highlights the fact that the use of the term “cameralism” in the practice of administration is linked to the regulatory activity of the councils of the Florentine Republic (1439), among which the “school of thinkers” was born, whose representatives labeled themselves as “cameralists”. It is emphasized that the point at which the needs of purely cameralistic economic management started to converge with new economic interests (creation of manufactories, improvement of socio-professional structuring of society, ensuring of an active trade balance, prohibition of import of certain goods and export of raw materials, introduction of reasoned customs duties on certain products, quality control, the use of forced labor, etc.) may be considered a sign indicating that management activities moved beyond early cameralism. The author shows the mechanism transforming the references about proper economic management into systematized knowledge about management of public resources which gradually gains theoretical content and appear as a scientific and educational discipline under the title “cameralistics”, with its subsequenttransformation into the special part of modern administrative law.

The findings of the study: 1) there is a correlation dependence between cameralistic relations and modern administrative law relations; 2) since their origination, cameralistic relations have been constantly evolving; 3) their evolution ensues from systematic accumulation of knowledge from practical recommendations on the conduct of cameralistic economy to theoretical generalizations; 4) cameralistic knowledge was in demand even after the relevant university curricula were closed, because for administrative law scholars, they formed the competencies needed to ensure economic growth; 5) they formed a specific system of knowledge about management (administration) in the realm of economy, which has eventually transformed into the sub-branch of modern administrative law; 6) today, an organic, explicable and consistent result of our study should be the renaming of the special part of administrative law from “Management in economy” to “Cameralistic administration”; 7) cameralistic relations are a major factor in the genesis of administrative law.

Bibliography

Authored books

1. Dithmar J Ch, Einleitung in der Oekonomische, Policei-und Cameral-Wissenschaft (Frankfurt ad der Oder 1731) (in German).

2. Gasser S P, Einleitung zu den Oekonomischen Politischen und Cameral-Wissenschaften (Halle 1729) (in German).

3. Groß R, Das “Politische Testament” des Melchior von Osse 1555/56 und die kursächsische Wirtschaftspolitik. Die sächsischen Kurfürsten während des Religionsfriedens von 1555 bis 1618 (Stuttgart 2007) (in German).

4. Langenn F A von, Doctor Melchior von Ossa. Eine Darstellung aus dem XVI. Jahrhundert (Leipzig, J. C. Hinrichs 1858) (in German).

5. Langenn F A von, Doctor Melchior von Ossa: Eine Darstellung aus dem XVI. Jahrhundert (German Edition) (Forgotten Books 2018) (in German).

6. Obrecht G, Fünff Vnderschiedliche Secreta Politica (Straßburg 1617) (in German).

7. Pauly J, Die Entstehung des Polizeirechts als wisenschaftliche Disziplin: Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte des öffentlichen Rechts (Vittorio Klostermann 2000) (in German).

8. Seckendorff V L von, Teutscher Fürstenstaat oder gründliche und kurtze Beschreibung, welcher Gestalt Fürstenthümer, Grafund Herrschafften im Heil (Franckfurt 1660) (in German).

9. Prokoshin V, Pravo, vlast’ i zhizneobespechenie naroda: osnovy novejshej kameralistiki [Law, Power and Life Support of the People: Fundamentals of Modern Cameralistics] (Katalog 2000) (in Russian).

10. Sorokina T, Vladimir Vasil’evich Markovnikov, 1837–1904 [Vladimir Vasilievich Markovnikov, 1837–1904] (Izd-vo Kazansk un-ta 2003) (in Russian).

Edited books

11. ‘Iz kapituljariev Karla Velikogo’ [‘From the Capitularies of Charlemagne’] v Levandovskij A, Karl Velikij. Cherez Imperiju k Evrope [Charlemagne. Through the Empire to Europe] (Soratnik 1995) (in Russian).

12. Vyshinskij A, ‘Osnovnye zadachi nauki sovetskogo socialisticheskogo prava’ [‘Main Tasks of the Science of Soviet Socialist Law’] v Osnovnye zadachi nauki sovetskogo socialisticheskogo prava: materialy 1-go soveshh. nauch. rabotnikov prava [Main Tasks of the Science of Soviet Socialist Law: Materials of the 1st Meeting of Scientists of Law] (Galkin red, Gosizdat 1938) (in Russian).

13. Istorija Srednih vekov: Ot Karla Velikogo do Krestovyh pohodov (768–1096 gg.) [History of the Middle Ages: From Charlemagne to the Crusades (768–1096)] (Stasjulevich M sost, Poligon 2001) (in Russian).

14. Marks K, ‘Kapital. Predislovie ko vtoromu izdaniju’ [‘Capital. Preface to the Second Edition’] v Marks K i Jengel’s F, Sochinenija [Essays], t 23 (Izd 2, Izd-vo politicheskoj literatury 1960) (in Russian).

15. Peshina Je, ‘Kameralizm kak proobraz sovremennoj nauki finansov’ [‘Cameralism as a Prototype of the Modern Science of Finance’] v Jekonomika, obshhestvo, chelovek: teorija, metodologija, real’nost’. Sbornik nauchnyh publikacij [Economics, Society, Individual: Theory, Methodology, Reality. Collected Scientific Publications], сhast’ 1 (Karh D otv red, 2015) (in Russian).

16. Ushinskij K, ‘Rech’ o kameral’nom obrazovanii’ [‘Speech about Cameralistic Education’] v Ushinskij K, Sobranie sochinenij [Collected Essays], t 1 (Izd-vo Akad ped nauk RSFSR 1948–1950) (in Russian).

Encyclopedias

17. Distel T, ‘Osse, Melchior von’ in Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. Band 24 (1887) 496–8 (in German).

18. Döring D, ‘Seckendorff, Veit Ludwig von’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie. Band 24 (2010) 117–8 (in German).

19. Fuchs F J, ‘Obrecht Georg’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie. Band 19 (1999) 404–5 (in German).

20. Luig K, ‘Osse, Melchior von’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie. Band 19 (1999) 609 (in German).

21. ‘Kameralistika’ [‘Cameralistics’] (Megajenciklopedija Kirilla i Mefodija) <https:// megabook.ru/article/Kameralistika> (data zvernennja: 20.04.2020) (in Russian).

22. ‘Kameralіzm’ [‘Cameralism’] (Vіkіpedіja, 12.06.2019) <https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki> (data zvernennja: 20.04.2020) (in Russian).

23. Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia: tematychnyi reiestr hasel z napriamu “Iurydychni nauky” [The Great Ukrainian Encyclopedia: Thematic Register of Slogans in “LegalSciences”] (Babkata V ta Shumylo M uklad, Entsyklopedychne vydavnytstvo 2017) (in Ukrainian).

24. Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia [The Great Ukrainian Encyclopedia of Law], t 1: Istoriia derzhavy i prava Ukrainy [History of State and Law of Ukraine] (Honcharenko V holova redkol, Pravo 2016) (in Ukrainian).

25. Yurydychna entsyklopediia [Encyclopedia of Law], t 3 (Shemshuchenko Yu holov redkol, Ukr entsykl 2001) (in Ukrainian).

Journals articles

26. Spannaus N, ‘The roots of the American system: from Cameralism to the American System of Economics’ (1996) American Almanac <http://american_almanac.tripod. com/cameral.htm> (accessed: 20.04.2020) (in English).

27. Taranovski T, ‘Constitutionalism and Political Culture in Imperial Russia (Late 19th – Early 20th Century)’ [2019] VI(3) BRiCS Law Journal 32 (in English).

28. Djatel E i Gatina Є, ‘Kameralistskie i policejskie idei I. T. Pososhkova o blagoustrojstve zemli russkoj’ [‘Cameralistic and Police Ideas of I. T. Pososhkov about Improvement of the Russian Land’] [2014] 6 (1) Zhurnal institucional’nyh issledovanij 36–42 (in Russian).

29. Djatel E i Stepchenkova M, ‘U istokov rossijskoj kameralistiki’ [‘At the Origins of Russian Cameralistics’] (2014) 2 Nacіonal’nij і derzhavnij globalіzacіjnij proces 27–8 (in Russian).

30. Gromova G, ‘Teoreticheskie problemy vydelenija administrativnogo prava v rossijskoj jurisprudencii’ [‘Theoretical Issues of Marking Out Administrative Law in Russian Jurisprudence’] (2014) 5 Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo 409–16 (in Russian).

31. Khasravi O, ‘Razvitie administrativnogo prava Rossijskoj Federacii’ [2013] 6–2 (1) [‘Development of Administrative Law of the Russian Federation’] Naukovij vіsnik Mіzhnarodnogo gumanіtarnogo unіversitetu 122–4 (in Russian).

32. Kolomoiets T ta Kolpakov V, ‘Suchasna paradyhma administratyvnoho prava: geneza i poniattia’ [‘Modern Paradigm of Administrative Law: The Genesis and Concept’] (2017) 5 Pravo Ukrainy 71–9 (in Ukrainian).

33. Malinovskaja V, ‘Genezis zapadnoevropejskoj nauki administrativnogo prava’ [‘Genesis of the Western European Science of Administrative Law’] [2017] 7 (5A) Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava 27–36 (in Russian).

34. Panasiuk R, ‘Rozvytok kameralnoho prava v Ukraini (teoretyko-metodolohichnyi aspekt)’ [‘Development of Cameralistic Law in Ukraine (Theoretical and Methodological Aspect)’] (2017) 1 Sudova apeliatsiia 21–7 (in Ukrainian).

35. Tuchak T, ‘Kameralistyka i kameralisty: iz istorii svitovoi finansovoi dumky’ [‘Cameralistics and Cameralists: From the History of the World Financial Thought’] (2017) 2 Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy i derzhava 183–190 (in Ukrainian).