The administrative law doctrine formation took place under the influence of determinative historical processes, changes and transformations in the content and structure of public administration.

The main purpose of the article is a deep analysis of the initial provisions of the administrative law doctrine, formulated under the influence of determinative historical processes, establishing patterns and tendencies in administrative law as a science and outlining promising views on administrative law of Ukraine.

Formation and development of administrative law as a science and an independent law field dates back to the XIX century – times of active introduction and using of police law, based on the priority of government institutions over the citizens private interests. The modern administrative law doctrine owes to police law clearly defined methods of relations legal regulation, in which one of the parties, the dominant party, is the authorized subject of governance.

The next historical stage in the development of the doctrine of administrative law is the 1920s, when Soviet power was finally established in Ukraine and the Soviet administrative law doctrine began to operate accordingly. It is claimed that Soviet administrative law, including its rules on the revision of government decisions, was built on an ideology that was absolutely far from the basic values of the rule of law. Nevertheless, the importance of the terminology of administrative law developed in Soviet times, which is still used today, is emphasized: “administrative legal act”, “state (public) administration”, “administrative process”, “administrative proceedings”, “administrative coercion”, “administrative justice”, “claim”, “complaint”, “administrative legal dispute”.

With the proclamation of Ukraine`s independence in 1991, the process of national administrative law formation began, which was freed from the odious forms of the totalitarian past, filled with national content, and borrowed foreign experience appropriate to national conditions. The guidelines of the science of administrative law were changed in the direction of humanism, democratic principles, and the rule of law elements. It is determined that the status of an individual in public administration is largely reformed, and now public authority operates primarily to meet the needs of an individual and society.

The article considers the influence on the formation of the modern doctrine of administrative law of three main schools of administrative law of Ukraine: Kyiv (V. Averyanov, O. Andriyko, V. Kolpakov, etc.), Kharkiv (O. Bandurka, Y. Bytyak, V. Garashchuk, etc.) and Odessa (L. Bila-Tiunova, A. Vasiliev, S. Kivalov, etc.). Prospective directions of the administrative law doctrine development of Ukraine are outlined, taking into account the existing gaps in the problems of scientific research and legal regulation of administrative legal relations.

Bibliography

Authored books

1. Kharytonova O, Administratyvno-pravovi vidnosyny (problemy teorii) (Odesa 2004) (in Ukrainian).

2. Koliushko I, Kuibida R (avtory-uporiadnyky), Administratyvna yustytsiia: yevropeiskyi dosvid i propozytsii dlia Ukrainy (Fakt 2003) (in Ukrainian).

3. Kolomoiets T, Hadzhyieva Sh, Kodeks yak dzherelo administratyvnoho prava Ukrainy: istoriia, suchasnist ta perspektyvy (ZNU 2014) (in Ukrainian).

4. Kolpakov V, Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: pidruchnyk (Iurinkom Inter 1999) (in Ukrainian).

5. Kolpakov V, Administratyvno-deliktnyi pravovyi fenomen (Iurinkom Inter 2004) (in Ukrainian). 6. Komziuk A, Bevzenko V, Melnyk R, Administratyvnyi protses Ukrainy: navchalnyi posibnyk (Pretsedent 2007) (in Ukrainian).

7. Konstantyi O, Dzherela administratyvnoho prava Ukrainy (Rada 2005) (in Ukrainian).

8. Koval L, Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: kurs lektsii (Zahalna chastyna) (Osnovy 1994) (in Ukrainian).

9. Kurinnyi Ye, Predmet i ob’iekt administratyvnoho prava Ukrainy (Lira LTD 2004) (in Ukrainian). 10. Luchenko D, Mekhanizm oskarzhennia v administratyvnomu pravi: teoretychni y prykladni aspekty (Pravo 2017) (in Ukrainian).

11. Radyshevska O, Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy v umovakh yevropeizatsii (Talkom 2020) (in Ukrainian).

12. Sharaia A, Teoriia pryntsypiv administratyvno-protsedurnoho prava (Helvetyka 219) (in Ukrainian).

Edited books

13. Aver’ianov V, ‘Predmet rehuliuvannia administratyvnoho prava ta yoho “publichnoservisna” skladova’ v Derzhavne upravlinnia: yevropeiski standarty, dosvid ta administratyvne pravo (Aver’ianov V red, 2007) 240–7 (in Ukrainian).

14. Administratyvne pravo: pidruchnyk (Bytiak Iu zah red, Pravo 2020) (in Ukrainian).

15. Harashchuk V, ‘Pryntsypy derzhavnoho kontroliu: onovlennia zmistu’ v Derzhavnyi kontrol u sferi vykonavchoi vlady: naukova dopovid (Aver’ianov V red, Yur nauka tsentr 2000) 18–21 (in Ukrainian).

16. Derzhavne upravlinnia: problemy administratyvno-pravovoi teorii ta praktyky (Aver’ianov V red, Fakt 2003) 435 (in Ukrainian).

17. Osnovy administratyvnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini: navchalnui posibnyk dlia yurydychnykh fakultetiv ta yurydychnykh klinik (Aleksandrova N, Kuibida R red, Konus-Iu 2006) (in Ukrainian). 18. Pravova doktryna Ukrainy, t 2: Publichno-pravova doktryna Ukrainy (Bytiak Iu red, Pravo 2013) (in Ukrainian).

19. Pravova systema Ukrainy: istoriia, stan ta perspektyvy, t 2: Konstytutsiini zasady pravovoi systemy Ukrainy i problemy yii vdoskonalennia (Bytiak Iu red, Pravo 2008) (in Ukrainian).

Journal articles

20. Aver’ianov V, ‘Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: doktrynalni aspekty reformuvannia’ (1988) 8 Pravo Ukrainy 8–13 (in Ukrainian).

21. Aver’ianov V, ‘Derzhavne upravlinnia u zmisti predmeta administratyvnoho prava’ [2004] 2 (37) Visn. Akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy 147 (in Ukrainian).

22. Aver’ianov V, ‘Liudynotsentrystska ideolohiia yak osnova reformuvannia ukrainskoho administratyvnoho prava v umovakh intehratsiinoho protsesu’ (2010) 2 Derzhava ta rehiony: Seriia: Pravo 87–92 (in Ukrainian).

23. Aver’ianov V, ‘Novi rysy predmeta ukrainskoho administratyvnoho prava’ (2005) 4 Personal 76–81 (in Ukrainian).

24. Aver’ianov V, ‘Predmet administratyvnoho prava: nova doktrynalna otsinka’ (2004) 10 Pravo Ukrainy 25–30 (in Ukrainian).

25. Boiko I, ‘Rol administratyvnoho prava u formuvanni pravovoho statusu liudyny i hromadianyna’ (2013) 2 Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy 157–64 (in Ukrainian).

26. Bytiak Yu, ‘Administratyvna vidpovidalnist ta administratyvne pravoporushennia’ (2020) 151 Problemy zakonnosti 87–100 (in Ukrainian).

27. Bytiak Yu, ‘Pryntsypy formuvannia ta diialnosti aparatu upravlinnia: istoriia i sohodennia’ (2006) 11 Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia 108–16 (in Ukrainian).

28. Bytiak Yu, Boiko I, Pysarenko H, ‘Systema administratyvnoho prava’ (2017) 12 Pravo Ukrainy 173–83 (in Ukrainian).

29. Denskyi I, ‘Predmet administratyvno-protsesualnoho prava: oznaky, poniattia ta struktura’ (2011) 7 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hos-vo i pravo 90–3 (in Ukrainian).

30. Dniprov O, ‘Administratyvno-pravovi vidnosyny v umovakh transformatsii predmeta administratyvnoho prava’ (2021) 3 Administratyvne pravo i protses 175–9 (in Ukrainian).

31. Ihonin R, ‘Do pytannia predmeta administratyvnoho prava’ [2010] 1 (4) Visn. Akad. myt. sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriia “Pravo” 46–51 (in Ukrainian).

32. Kolomoiets T, ‘Dzherela administratyvnoho prava: problemni pytannia doktrynalnoho vyznachennia, klasyfikatsii ta systemnoho analizu’ (2017) 6 Pravo Ukrainy 72–9 (in Ukrainian).

33. Kolomoiets T, Kolpakov V, ‘Suchasna paradyhma administratyvnoho prava: heneza i poniattia’ (2017) 5 Pravo Ukrainy 71–9 (in Ukrainian).

34. Kolpakov V, ‘Administratyvno-pravovi vidnosyny: poniattia i vydy’ (2013) 1 Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal 102–4 (in Ukrainian).

35. Kolpakov V, Matselyk T, ‘Predmet administratyvnoho prava: onovlennia paradyhmy’ (2010) 8 Pravo Ukrainy 110–5 (in Ukrainian).

36. Konstantyi O, ‘Do pytannia poniattia, predmeta, metodu i systemy administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy’ (2019) 8 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 86–90 (in Ukrainian).

37. Luchenko D, ‘Administratyvnyi pozov yak protsesualna forma zakhystu prav fizychnykh i yurydychnykh osib v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi’ (2013) 4 Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy 90–8 (in Ukrainian).

38. Melnyk R, ‘Novely suchasnoi kontseptsii ukrainskoho administratyvnoho prava’ (2017) 5 LEX PORTUS 5–16 (in Ukrainian).

39. Myroniuk R, ‘Poniattia ta sutnist administratyvnoho protsesualnoho prava: suchasni pidkhody do rozuminnia’ (2012) 3 Pravo i suspilstvo: naukovyi zhurnal 127–32 (in Ukrainian).

40. Nyzhnyk N, Kovalenko S, ‘Deiaki aspekty administratyvnoho prava’ [1999] 2 (II) Zb. nauk. pr. Ukr. Akad. derzh. upr. pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy 232 (in Ukrainian).

41. Reshota V, ‘Akty orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v systemi dzherel administratyvnoho prava’ (2017) 6 Pravo i suspilstvo 126–31 (in Ukrainian).

42. Reshota V, ‘Sudovyi pretsedent yak dzherelo administratyvnoho prava v Ukraini’ [2018] 3 (2) Visegrad Journal on Human Rights 137–41 (in Ukrainian).

43. Shevchenko E, ‘Vyznachennia poniattia administratyvno-pravovykh vidnosyn z urakhuvanniam priorytetnoho znachennia ta roli v nykh sub’iekta administratyvnoho prava (na prykladi administratyvnoho sudu)’ (2011) 1 Forum prava 1116–22 (in Ukrainian).

44. Stetsenko S, ‘Suchasnyi pohliad na predmet administratyvnoho prava’ [2016] 1 (21) Publichne pravo 20–6 (in Ukrainian).

45. Todyka Yu, ‘Konstytutsiia i pravova doktryna’ [2000] 1 (20) Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy 42–50 (in Ukrainian).

 Theses

46. Heorhiievskyi Yu, ‘Administratyvna yustytsiia’ (avtoref dys kand yuryd nauk, 2004) (in Ukrainian).

47. Ilkov V, ‘Dzherela prava v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy’ (dys d-ra yuryd nauk, 2017) (in Ukrainian).

48. Kurylo V, ‘Administratyvni pravovidnosyny u silskomu hospodarstvi Ukrainy’ (avtoref dys d-ra yuryd nauk, 2008) (in Ukrainian).

49. Kuzmenko O, ‘Administratyvnyi protses u perehliadi prava’ (avtoref dys d-ra yuryd nauk, 2006) (in Ukrainian).

50. Pedko Yu, ‘Stanovlennia ta pravove rehuliuvannia administratyvnoi yustytsii v Ukraini’ (dys kand yuryd nakn, 2004) (in Ukrainian).

51. Pukhtetska A, ‘Ievropeiski pryntsypy administratyvnoho prava ta yikh zaprovadzhennia v zakonodavstvi Ukrainy’ (avtoref dys kand yuryd nauk, 2009) (in Ukrainian).

52. Pysarenko N, ‘Kontseptualni osnovy administratyvnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini’ (dys d-ra yuryd nauk, 2019) (in Ukrainian).

53. Radyshevska O, ‘Ievropeizatsiia administratyvnoho prava Ukrainy: pytannia teorii i praktyky’ (avtoref dys d-ra yuryd nauk, 2021) (in Ukrainian).

Conference papers

54. Tymoshchuk V, ‘Administratyvni akty v Ukraini – povernennia do yevropeiskoi tradytsii nalezhnoho uriaduvannia’ v Yevropeiskyi shliakh do nalezhnoho upravlinnia: materialy mizhnaridnykh naukovo-praktychnykh doslidzhen (Zaichuk O red, In-t zakonodavstva Verkhov Rady Ukrainy 2013) 262–84 (in Ukrainian).

Websites

 55. Bevzenko V, ‘Administratyvne pravo: zabuta spadshchyna y nevyvcheni uroky. Z istorii natsionalnoi administratyvno-pravovoi dumky’ (29.07.2019) <https://lexinform.com. ua/dumka-eksperta/administratyvne-pravo-zabuta-spadshhyna-j-nevyvcheni-urokyzistoriyi-natsionalnoyi-administratyvno-pravovoyi-dumky> (accessed: 29.09.2021) (in Ukrainian).