Article title Views on the Grounds of Reviewing the Ownership Doctrine
Authors

Doctor of Law, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine,  Honored Worker of Science and Technology, Professor of the Department of Civil Law Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University (Kharkiv, Ukraine) ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3447-1252 isfateeva@gmail.com

 

Name of magazine Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version)
Issue 5/2021
Сторінки [13-28]
Annotation

Property is a defining category for economics, social sciences, law. The attitude to it is expressed in philosophy, religion, in the field of culture and in other views. Legal regulation of property is important for each individual and society as a whole. There is a connection between legal regulation not only with the economy of a certain country in a certain period, but also with the global economy and legal relations that are developing in the world. From time to time the legislation needs to be reformed, the legal regulation is changed – first at the mini level due to some changes in the Civil Code and laws, the formation of legal positions of the Supreme Court, to update the basic law, which embodies the rules governing property relations – the Civil Code. Such changes must be based on a clear and well-thought-out doctrine, without which adequate legal regulation in a renewed social environment is not possible. This doctrine should reflect significant changes in property rights in recent times and relating to the objects of property rights, the scope of this right, strengthening the role of state regulators, the motivation of the person who becomes the owner of certain property, which also depends on many changes in legal relations of civil turnover, services, etc. 

Keywords property rights; objects; private property; public property; scope of property rights, ownership doctrine.
References

Bibliography

 

Authored books

1. Kantorovich Ja, Osnovnye idei grazhdanskogo prava (Hаrkіv-druk 1927) (in Russian).

2. Leiashvili P, Pravda i lozh’ o bankah, den’gah i kredite (SIAHLE 2017) (in Russian).

Journal articles

3. Hazlett Th W, ‘The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum’ (1990) 33 The Journal of Law and Economics 133 (in English).

4. Mjerill T U, Smit D Je, ‘Chto sluchilos’ s pravom sobstvennosti v ramkah jekonomicheskogo analiza prava?’ (2016) 1 Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 264 (in Russian).

5. Sabodash R, ‘Pravo ochikuvannia na nerukhome maino: do pytannia pro moment ta pravomirnist vynyknennia’ v Pravomirni ochikuvannia: zbirnyk statei (I SpasyboFatyeyeva red, EKUS 2020) 106–12 (in Ukrainian).

6. Slipchenko S, ‘Shchodo rozuminnia zakonnykh ochikuvan yak maina’ v Pravomirni ochikuvannia: zbirnyk statei (I Spasybo-Fatyeyeva red, EKUS 2020) 113–28 (in Ukrainian).

7. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Zametki civilista o tendencijah poznanija prava sobstvennosti’ (2011) 5 Pravo Ukrainy 29–36 (in Russian).

8. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Korporatyvna vlasnist’ Suchasni problemy pryvatnoho prava: zbirnyk naukovykh prats prysviachenykh 80-i richnytsi z Dnia narodzhennia Yaroslavny Mykhailivny Shevchenko (Kuznetsova N, Stefanchuk R red, Asotsiatsiia tsyvilistiv Ukrainy 2012) 291–315 (in Ukrainian).

9. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Poniattia maina, mainovykh ta korporatyvnykh prav yak ob’iektiv prava vlasnosti’ (2004) 5 Visnyk komertsiinoho prava 9–18 (in Ukrainian).

10. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Transformery vlasnosti v indyvidualno-suspilnomu aspekti’ (2006) 1 visnyk APNU 91–9 (in Ukrainian).

11. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Zahalnyi ohliad rozuminnia poniattia prava ochikuvannia ta yoho znachennia dlia zakhystu mainovykh prav osib’ v Pravomirni ochikuvannia: zbirnyk statei (Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I red, EKUS 2020) 137–46 (in Ukrainian).

 

Conference papers

12. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Deiaki sposterezhennia za zminamy instytutu prava vlasnosti’ v Aktualni problemy yurydychnoi nauky: zbirnyk tez Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii “Dvanadtsiati osinni yurydychni chytannia”. Chastyna druha (Khmelnytskyi universytet upravlinnia ta prava 2013) 138–40 (in Ukrainian).

13. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Pravo na vilne vyslovlennia pohliadiv v korporatokratychnomu suspilstvi’ v Dev’iati yurydychni dysputy z aktualnykh problem pryvatnoho prava, prysviacheni pam’iati Ye. V. Vaskovskoho: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Kanzafarova I red, Astroprynt 2019) 60–5 (in Ukrainian).

14. Spasybo-Fatyeyeva I, ‘Reformuvannia vidnosyn vlasnosti na suchasnomu etapi rozvytku prava Ukrainy’ v Materialy II Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii studentiv ta aspirantiv “Problemni pytannia tsyvilnoho ta hospodarskoho prava” (Kharkiv) 8–11 (in Ukrainian).Websites 15. Grignon, ‘Money as Debt’ <https://www.socioeco.org/bdf_fiche-video-4_en.html> (accessed: 31.05.2021) (in English).

16. ‘Bol’shaja igra na ponizhenie kripty. Mehanizm finansovoj katastrofy’ <https://habr. com/ru/post/538198> (accessed: 31.05.2021) (in English).

17. ‘Kak innovacii izmenjat bankovskuju otrasl’ Rossii’ (RBK. Trendy) <https://trends.rbc. ru/trends/innovation/5d63fd8f9a7947e067daea90> (accessed: 31.05.2021) (in English).

18. ‘Kitajskij milliarder postroil v podarok odnosel’chanam 258 roskoshnyh vill, no iz-za zhadnosti tam nikto ne zhivet’ (Novosti v fotografijah) <https://bigpicture.ru/milliarderpostroilv-podarok-odnoselchanam-258-roskoshnyx-vill-no-iz-za-zhadnosti-tam-niktonezhivet> (accessed: 31.05.2021) (in Russian).