Article | Legal Status of District in the City and Features of Establishing its Boundaries |
---|---|
Authors |
SERHII POTAPENKO
Doctor of philosophy Degree Field of Study 08 Law Programme Subject Area 081 Law (Bila Tserkva, Ukraine) ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-5971 potap7720@ukr.net
|
Name of magazine | Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version) |
Issue | 5 / 2022 |
Pages | 135 - 155 |
Annotation | Since 1917 the district in the city became a link of the administrativeterritorial division of large cities of the Ukrainian Socialist Soviet Republic (USSR). Powers regarding to create and liquidate of districts in cities, as well as the establishment of their boundaries, gradually passed from the center to the lower levels of government. For a long time, the city district had an unclear status in the administrative-territorial system of the USSR. Most of the districts in the cities were formed during Soviet times, in independent Ukraine district division was carried out only in Kyiv, Zaporizhzhia, Lviv, and Odesa. However, doctrinal studies of the legal status of the district in the city and the peculiarities of establishing its boundaries in historical retrospect and in the conditions of fragmentary regulation of this issue at the level of legislation in our country have hardly been conducted. This work is the first scientific investigation in domestic legal literature. The purpose of the article is to establish the legal status of the territory of the district in the city and the peculiarities of establishing (changing) its boundaries. In order to achieve it, іt is analyzed the legislation, which regulated the procedure for the formation and liquidation of urban districts in the USSR. It is studied doctrinal sources, special literature, and normative documents that determine the types of urban planning and land management documentation, based on which the boundaries of the district in the city are established (were established). It was established that the administrative center, asan attribute of the administrative-territorial unit, is not characteristic of urban districts, except of the Balaklava city district of Sevastopol. As a result, it is distinguished four main stages in the History of district division in large cities and it is formulated the author’s definition of the concept of “district in the city” is. It was established that there is no district of the city, formed during the independence of Ukraine, has a procedure for establishing (changing) its borders, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Art. Art. 173, 174 of the Land Code of Ukraine, and therefore their boundaries are only conditional and not legally defined. It is argued that the definition of the boundaries of the city district is possible only if the city boundary is established.
|
Keywords | administrative-territorial unit; area; district in the city; border of the territory of the district in the city; general plan of the city; city planning and development project; detailed plan of the territory of the residential (industrial) district; land management project regarding the establishment of boundaries of the territory of the administrativeterritorial unit |
References | Bibliography
Authored books 1. Aleshin V, Razvitie predstavlenija o socialisticheskom poselenii v gradostroitel’stve Ukrainy v 1920-h – nachale 1930-h godov (1985) (in Russian). 2. Dikanskij M, Postrojka gorodov, ih plan i krasota (Izdanie N P Karbasnikova 1915) (in Russian). 3. Dubelir G, Planirovka gorodov (1910) (in Russian). 4. Eroshkin N, Istorija gosudarstvennyh uchrezhdenij dorevoljucionnoj Rossii: Uchebnik dlja studentov vysshih uchebnih zavedenij po special’nosti “Istoriko-arhivovedenie” (3-e izd pererab, 1983) (in Russian). 5. Knatc B, Goroda-sady v svjazi s zhilishhnym voprosom (1918) (in Russian). 6. Kolchin B, Janin V, Arheologii Novgoroda 50 let (Nauka 1982) (in Russian). 7. Kosenko Ju, Sovetskoe gradostroitel’stvo 1917–1941 (Progress-Tradicija 2018) (in Russian). 8. Kos’kov B, Pavlov K. Rukovodstvo po perenosu proektov planirovki i zastrojki v naturu (Gosudarstvennoe nauchno-tehnicheskoe izdatel’stvo po geologii i ohrane nedr 1963) (in Russian). 9. Kovalevskij G, Bol’shoj gorod i goroda-sady: Posobie dlja dejatelej po gorodskomu i zemskomu delu i studentov (1916) (in Russian). 10. Kudrytskyi A, Vulytsi Kyieva. Dovidnyk (Ukrainska entsyklopediia im M P Bazhana 1995) (in Ukrainian). 11. Miljutin N, Problema stroitel’stva socialisticheskih gorodov. Osnovnye voprosy racional’noj planirovki i stroitel’stva naselennyh mest SSSR (Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo) (in Russian). 12. Moskaliuk A. Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustrii Ukrainy. Shliakhy reformuvannia (Heoprynt 2007) (in Ukrainian). 13. Vermenych Ya, Іstorychna regіonalіstyka: navchalnyi posibnyk (2014) (in Ukrainian). 14. Vermenych Ya, Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustrii Ukrainy: evoliutsiia, suchasnyi stan, problemy reformuvannia, ch 2 (Instytut istorii Ukrainy 2009) (in Ukrainian).
Edited books 15. Batanov O, ‘Terytorialnyi ustrii Ukrainy’ v Shemchushenko Yu (red), Konstytutsiine pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs: pidruchnyk, t 2 (Iurydychna dumka 2008) (in Ukrainian). 16. Ivanova A, Gorodskie rajony usadebnoj zastrojki (Malozemov red, Izdatel’stvo Akademii arhitektury USSR 1952) (in Russian). 17. Ivanova A, Planirovka i zastrojka gorodskih zhilyh rajonov (Severov N red, Izd-vo Akad Arhitektury URSR 1953) (in Russian). 18. Kirpichnikov A, ‘Posad srednevekovoj Ladogi’ v Kirpichnikov A, Srednevekovaja Ladoga (1985) (in Russian). 19. Kravchenko V, ‘Kontseptsiia mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Konstytutsii Ukrainy’ v Kravchenko V, Baimuratov M, Batanov O (red), Aktualni problemy stanovlennia ta rozvytku mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini (Atika 2007) (in Ukrainian). 20. Kresina I (red), Reformuvannia administratyvno-terytorialnoho ustroiu: ukrainskyi ta zarubizhnyi dosvid (Instytut derzhavy i prava Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy Lohos 2011) (in Ukrainian). 21. Tolochko P, Drevnerusskij feodal’nyj gorod (Vysockij S red, Naukova dumka 1989) (in Russian).
Dictionaries 22. Etymolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy, t 5: R–T ( Melnych O uk ta in red kol, Naukova dumka 2006) (in Ukrainian). 23. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy, t 8: Pryroda–Riakhtlyvyi (Naukova dumka) (in Ukrainian).
Encyclopedias 24. Yurydychna entsyklopediia, t 5: P–S (Shemshuchenko Iu vidp red, Ukrainska entsyklopediia M P Bazhanova 2003) (in Ukrainian).
Journal articles 25. Korniienko M, ‘Raionni u mistakh rady yak konstytutsiinyi instytut’ (2011) 2 Pravo Ukrainy 201 (in Ukrainian). 26. Malozemov I, ‘Bol’shoe Zaporozh’e’ (1932) 5–6 Sovetskaja arhitektura 72–80 (in Russian). 27. Orel’skaja O, ‘Novye idei v gradostroitel’stve 1920–1930-h godov i pervyj prakticheskij opyt v stroitel’stve socgorodov. Na primere socgoroda Avtozavoda v Nizhnem Novgorode’ (2009) 4 Gradostroitel’stvo 44–49 (in Russian). 28. Potapenko S, ‘Pravovyi status terytorii terytorialnykh hromad u systemi administratyvnoterytorialnoho ustroiu Ukrainy’ (2021) 12 Pravo Ukrainy 229 (in Ukrainian). Theses 29. Hetman A, ‘Konstytutsiino-pravovi zasady administratyvno-terytorialnoho ustroiu Ukrainy’ (avtoref dys kand yuryd nauk, 2013) (in Ukrainian). 30. Huban R, ‘Stanovlennia ta rozvytok administratyvno-terytorialnoho ustroiu Ukrainy v XX – na pochatku XXI stolittia (istoryko-pravove doslidzhennia)’ (dys d-ra yuryd nauk, 2018) (in Ukrainian).
Conference papers 31. Kalynovskyi B, ‘Terytorialnyi ustrii ta mistseve samovriaduvannia v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku’ v VII Mizhnarodna naukova konferentsiia studentiv ta molodykh vchenykh. Vid hromadianskoho suspilstva – do pravovoi derzhavy. Zbirnyk tez (27 kvitnia 2012 r.) (in Ukrainian).
|
Electronic version | Download |