Responsive image
Article Ensuring the System of National Legislation in Conditions of War: The Parliamentary Dimension
Authors
VOLODYMYR VENHER

Ph.D. in Law, Associate professor, Jurisprudence and Public Law Department at the National University “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”  (Kyiv, Ukraine) ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-3996 venhervm@ukma.edu.ua

 

Name of magazine Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version)
Issue 1 / 2023
Pages 76 - 93
Annotation

The war challenges the possibility of using the legal norms as an effective regulator of social relations. Under such conditions, the proper legislative activity of the parliament as a legislative body is the basis for ensuring the system of national legislation. To develop a more appropriate response to the war challenges, the Constitution of Ukraine provides for the possibility of introducing martial law as a special legal regime. This regime enables usage of exceptional legal and administrative tools, which, on the one hand, will significantly increase the level of discretion of the public authorities for such a response, and on the other – will provide the possibility of real guarantee and protection of basic human rights. It is extremely important to determine the basic requirements for the legislative activity of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine in wartime.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of legislative powers by the Ukrainian Parliament in the conditions of martial law and to ensure the system of national legislation through the prism of compliance with the main components of the rule of law.

The article presents practical examples of the implementation of legislative regulation in some areas, where the need to ensure compliance with the principles of legality, legal certainty, the prohibition of abuse of power, the principle of equality and nondiscrimination, and access to justice is clearly crucial. Adoption of new laws (parliamentary statutory legislation) and amendments to existing ones should be carried out by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, considering the key requirement to balance between the urgent needs of protecting national sovereignty, meeting the needs of the military command, and protecting human rights. From the Parliament’s practical law-making activities perspective, there is a need to ensure the priority of qualitative, predictable, and non-discriminatory normative regulation of legal relations at the level of law (parliamentary statutes according to article 92 of the Ukrainian Constitution), which will guarantee the realization of human rights in conditions of martial law and, if necessary, provide the possibility of judicial protection of human rights.

 

Keywords parliament; system of legislation; rule of law; legality; legal certainty; access to justice
References

Bibliography

Edited books

1. Hasebe Ya, ‘War Powers’ in Rosenfeld M, Sajó A (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford UP 2012) (in English).

2. Mirylo verkhovenstva prava (pravovladdia) natsionalnoho rivnia: praktyka Ukrainy (Rule of law Checklist at national level: case of Ukraine) (Koziubry M za zah red, Holovatyi S peredmova, Venher V, Holovatyi S, Zaiets A, Zvieriev Ye, Koziubra M, Matvieieva Yu, Tseliev O uporiad ta avtory komentariv, Tsentr doslidzhennia problem verkhovenstva prava ta yoho vtilennia v natsionalnu praktyku Ukrainy Natsionalnoho universytetu “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia” 2021) (in Ukrainian).

 

Journal articles

3. Feldman W, ‘Theories of Emergency Powers: A Comparative Analysis of American Martial Law and the French State of Siege’ [2005] 38 (3) Cornell International Law Journal 1041 (in English).

4. Jakab A, ‘German Constitutional Law and Doctrine on State of Emergency – Paradigms and Dilemmas of a Traditional (Continental) Discourse’ [2006] 7 (5) German Law Journal 453–77. doi:10.1017/S207183220000479X (in English).

5. Koziubra M I, ‘Pryntsypy verkhovenstva prava i pravovoi derzhavy: yednist osnovnykh vymoh’ (2007) 64 Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky 3–9 (in Ukrainian).

6. Luspenyk D, ‘Verkhovenstvo prava – “novyi” staryi pryntsyp tsyvilnoho sudochynstva: spivvidnoshennia iz pryntsypom zakonnosti’ (2017) 8 Pravo Ukrainy 15 (in Ukrainian).

7. Matvieieva Yu I, ‘Poniattia ta rozuminnia pryntsypu pravovoi vyznachenosti’ (2017) 200 Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky 93–7 (in Ukrainian).

8. Savchyn M, ‘Zabezpechennia konstytutsiinoho poriadku ta stan viiny’ (2017) 2 Ukrainskyi chasopys konstytutsiinoho prava 39–59 (in Ukrainian).

9. Smokovych M I, ‘Dystantsiina forma pravosuddia yak harantiia bezpeky suddiv pid chas voiennoho stanu’ (2022) 3 Pravo Ukrainy 26–38 (in Ukrainian).

Websites

10. Diaz Crego M, Kotanidis S, ‘States of emergency in response to the coronavirus crisis: Normative response and parliamentary oversight in EU Member States during the first wave of the pandemic’ (European Parliamentary Research Service) (accessed: 20.12.2022) (in English).

 

Electronic version Download