The relevance of the conducted research is related to current challenges regarding the supply of medicines and their cost against the background of huge losses in the dead and wounded among the military and the civilian population, a decrease in the income of the population and an extremely difficult situation with a deficit of the state budget in Ukraine. Intellectual property rights, by limiting competition in the market, contribute to maintaining high prices for medicinal products and limiting sources of supply. At the same time, in the absence of patent barriers to market access for cheaper generic versions of medicines, optimal pricing and supply opportunities can be achieved.

The purpose of this article is to study the ways of limiting intellectual property rights allowed by international law within the framework of the WTO TRIPS Agreement, which are the most convenient and effective in the conditions of a full-scale war, which will potentially contribute to the formulation of separate proposals for improving the legislation of Ukraine on relevant issues.

Within the scope of the article, the authors describe the main ways and approaches available within the framework of international intellectual property law to limit intellectual property rights, the so-called TRIPS flexibilities, in order to ensure optimal access of the population to medical products and create an optimal balance between private rights and public interests. It was determined that the most effective and convenient for implementation in wartime would be the application of the security exception under Article 73 of the TRIPS Agreement.

An analysis of the available legal practice on the application by other countries of the security exception in the framework of dispute settlement by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body was carried out. According to the two cases considered, the test for justifying the legitimacy of the application of the security exception by the WTO member countries, which was applied by the Dispute Settlement Body, was described and the potential compliance of the current situation in Ukraine with the requirements of the test was analyzed.

In the conclusions based on the results of the conducted research, the directions for further improvement of the legislation of Ukraine in the field of intellectual property, taking into account the requirements of the WTO TRIPS Agreement, are suggested by the authors.

Bibliography

Edited books

1. Correa C M, ‘Interpreting the Flexibilities Under the TRIPS Agreement’ in Correa C M, Hilty R M (eds), Access to Medicines and Vaccines (Springer 2022) (in English).

Journal articles

2. Beyleveld A, ‘The WTO TRIPS Waiver and Essential Security Rights in 2022’ (2022) 235 Southviews <https://www.southcentre.int/southviews-no-235-10-march-2022> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

3. Gurgula Olga, ‘Saving Ukrainian Lives during the Russian War: Ukraine Must Waive IP Rights under Article 73 TRIPS to Provide Access to Essential Medicines’ [2022] 71 (8) GRUR International 719–30 (in English).

4. Yong K, ‘A hope fulfilled Malaysia’s journey to curing hepatitis C’ (2021) (348) Third World Network, Briefing Paper 17–22 <https://www.twn.my/title2/ resurgence/2021/348/health1.htm> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

5. Kashyntseva O, ‘Dosvіd Ukraїni z іmplementacії gnuchkih polozhen’ Ugodi TRІPS u dvoh kontekstah: єvroіntegracії ta pandemії’ (2021) 5 Teorіja і praktika іntelektual’noї vlasnostі 140–5 (in Ukrainian).

6. Ponomarova O, ‘Primusova, vіdkrita ta dobrovіl’na lіcenzії na lіkars’kі zasobi: dejakі aspekti pravozastosuvannja’ (2019) 3 Teorіja і praktika іntelektual’noї vlasnostі 32–8 (in Ukrainian).

Newspaper articles

7. Kasper E, Esco A, ‘Savings from Parallel Imports in Europe’ (Affordable Medicines Europe, January 2020) <https://affordablemedicines.eu/portfolio-item/savings-fromparallelimports-in-europe> (accessed: 02.03.2023) (in English).

8. Mittal V, ‘Military Casualties in Russia-Ukraine War Are Likely Less Than Commonly Stated’ (Forbes, 05.03.2023) <https://www.forbes.com/sites/vikrammit tal/2023/03/05/ military-casualties-in-russia-ukraine-war-are-likely-less-than-commonlystated/? sh=333693f1a5de> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

9. ‘Pid Makarovym zghoriv sklad “Farmaku”, vtraty – 1,5 miliarda’ (Ekonomichna Pravda, 22.03.2022) <https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2022/03/22/684479> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in Ukrainian).

10. Slipachuk T, Brovko O, ‘Chy mozhe Ukraina zakhystyty svoiu ekonomiku vid RF, ne porushuiuchy norm SOT?’ (Ievropeiska Pravda, 11.06.2015) <https://www. eurointegration.com.ua/experts/2015/06/11/7034648> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in Ukrainian).

11. ‘Ukraina zaprovadzhuie polozhennia Bolar’ (Yevropeiska biznes asotsiatsiia, 04.06.2020) <https://eba.com.ua/ukrayina-zaprovadzhuye-polozhennya-bolar> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in Ukrainian).

12. ‘Ukraina rozrakhovuie zakryty defitsyt biudzhetu v $ 38 miliardiv zavdiaky pidtrymtsi partneriv – Shmyhal’ (Ukrinform, 06.12.2022) <https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubriceconomy/ 3628810-ukraina-rozrahovue-zakriti-deficit-budzetu-v-38-milardiv-zavdakipidtrimcipartneriv-smigal.html> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in Ukrainian).

Websites

13. Abbott F, ‘The TRIPS Agreement Article 73 Security Exceptions and the COVID-19 Pandemic’ (South Centre, Research Papers, 116, August 2020) 10 <https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3682260> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

14. Correa C M, ‘Expanding the production of COVID-19 vaccines to reach developing countries Lift the barriers to fight the pandemic in the Global South’ (South Centre, Policy Brief 92, April 2021) <https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ PB-92.pdf> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

15. Droege C, ‘Armed conflict in Ukraine: a recap of basic IHL rules’ (The Humanitarian Law & Policy blog, 17.03.2022) <https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2022/03/17/armedconflictin-ukraine-a-recap-of-basic-ihl-rules> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

16. ‘Good practice guide: Improving Access to Treatment by Utilizing Public Health Flexibilities in the WTO TRIPS Agreement’ (UNDP, December 2010) 15 <https:// www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Good%20Practice%20 Guide-Improving%20access%20to%20treatment%20by%20utilizing%20public%20 health%20flexibilities%20in%20the%20WTO%20TRIPS%20agreement.pdf> (accessed: 02.03.2023) (in English).

17. ‘ICRC, Commentary on the First Geneva Convention: Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 2nd edition, 2016’ <https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gci-1949/article-2/com mentary/2016?activeTab=undefined> 211, 213 (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

18. ‘The campaign for use of compulsory licensing in Thailand’ (18.02.2015) <https:// makemedicinesaffordable.org/the-campaign-for-use-of-compulsory-licensing-inthailand> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).

19. ‘Ukraine: As humanitarian crisis deepens, parties urgently need to agree on concrete measures; misinformation risks lives’ (ICRC website, 29.03.2022) <https://www.icrc. org/en/document/ukraine-humanitarian-crisis-deepens-parties-urgently-need-agreeconcretemeasures> (accessed: 26.03.2023) (in English).