Responsive image
Article Legal Bases for the “Uniting For Peace” Mechanism and its Use in the Conditions of the Russian Federation’s War Against Ukraine
Authors
OLEKSIY KRESIN

Doctor of legal sciences, Associated professor, Chair of Comparative Jurisprudence Centre Volodymyr Koretskyi Institute of State and Law, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine)  ORCID ID:  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4016-6596  okresin@gmail.com

Name of magazine Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version)
Issue 1 / 2024
Pages 13 - 29
Annotation

The author analyzes comprehensively the “Uniting for Peace” mechanism, which was formulated and adopted by the UN General Assembly as a result of looking for a way out of the situation when the Security Council, as a body entrusted with the main responsibility in the field of maintaining international peace and security by the UN Charter, is unable to fulfill its duties due to the use by one of the states – permanent members of this body of its right of veto. Attention is paid to the development of this mechanism in recent years and its use for the adoption of a set of resolutions in response to the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Theauthor concludes that the resolution of 1950 “Uniting for Peace” became a concentrated expression of understanding by the member states of the broad competence of the UN General Assembly. Without violating the statutory advisory powers of this body, it created new mechanisms for their implementation. First of all, this concerns the efficiency of convening sessions and the simplified procedure for preparing issues for consideration by the General Assembly, as well as not only authorization, but also direct coordination by this body of collective actions of member states in the field of maintaining international peace and security. The UN General Assembly legitimately took upon itself the solution of issues related to the aggression of the Russian Federation in Ukraine, albeit with the help of more limited means than those of the Security Council. The appeal to the “Uniting for Peace” mechanism also remains symbolic, and states continue to attach special importance to the resolutions adopted within this framework – as the final solution to the most complex and controversial issues on behalf of the UN as an organization, not its individual body.

 

Keywords international organizations; acts of international organizations; law of international organizations; international peace and security; Russian aggression against Ukraine.
References

Bibliography

 

Edited books

1.Krasno J, Das M, ‘The Uniting for Peace resolution and other ways of circumventing the authority of the Security Council’ v B Cronin, I Hurd (ed), The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority (Routledge 2008).

 

Journal articles

2. Ahmad N, ‘The Erosion of the Prohibition on the Use of Force in the Face of United Nations Security Council Inaction: How Can the United Nations General Assembly Maintain International Peace?’ [2002] 1 (2) Chicago Journal of International Law Online 81–98.

3. Carswell A J, ‘Unblocking the UN Security Council: The Uniting for Peace Resolution’ [2013] 18 (3) Journal of Conflict & Security Law 453, 455–6, 476, 478–9.

4. Johnson L D, ‘“Uniting for Peace”: Does It Still Serve Any Useful Purpose?’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 108–15.

5. Kirgis F L, ‘He Got It Almost Right’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law Unbound 116–7.

6. Mamlyuk B N, ‘Uniting for “Peace” in the Second Cold War: A Response to Larry Johnson’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law Unbound 129–34.

7. Nanda V P, ‘The Security Council Veto in the Context of Atrocity Crimes, Uniting for Peace and the Responsibility to Protect’ [2020] 52 (1) Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 136, 139–40.

 8. Peters A, ‘The War in Ukraine and the Curtailment of the Veto in the Security Council’ [2023] 5 (1) La Revue Européenne du Droit. 87–93.

9. Richardson H, ‘Comment on Larry Johnson, “Uniting for Peace”’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law Unbound 135–40.

10. Scharf M, ‘Power Shift: The Return of the Uniting for Peace Resolution’ (2023) 55 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 7.

11. Kresin O, ‘Zmist, kharakter, pravove i politychne znachennia rezoliutsii Heneralnoi Asamblei Orhanizatsii Ob’iednanykh Natsii shchodo protydii ahresii Rosiiskoi Federatsii proty Ukrainy u 2014–2023 rr.’ (2023) 11 Pravo Ukrainy 35–57.

12. Kresin O, ‘Pytannia shchodo kharakteru rezoliutsii Heneralnoi Asamblei Orhanizatsii Ob’iednanykh Natsii u doktryni mizhnarodnoho prava’ (2022) 11 Pravo Ukrainy 128–47.

13. Kresin O, ‘Kharakter povnovazhen ta aktiv Heneralnoi Asamblei OON: statutni polozhennia ta evoliutsiia yikh tlumachennia’ (2022) 7 Pravo Ukrainy 112–26.

14. Renov Ye, ‘Shchodo deiakykh aspektiv diialnosti OON v konteksti pidtrymky suverenitetu ta terytorialnoi tsilisnosti Ukrainy’ (2022) 5 Juris Europensis Scientia 44–48.

15. Todorov I, Todorova N, ‘OON u protydii rosiiskii ahresii v Ukraini’ [2023] 1 (30) Heopolityka Ukrainy: istoriia i suchasnist 32–43.

 

Conference paper

16. Rabinovych P, ‘Diialnist Orhanizatsii Ob’iednanykh Natsii u protydii viiskovii ahresii Rosiiskoi Federatsii proty Ukrainy’ v Konstytutsiini prava i svobody liudyny ta hromadianyna v umovakh voiennoho stanu: mat-ly nauk. seminaru (Kovaliv M, Havryltsiv M, Lepish N upor, LvDUVS 2022).

17. Tymchuk O, ‘Reaktsiia Heneralnoi Asamblei OON na rosiiske vtorhnennia v Ukrainu’ v Aktualni problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku yurydychnoi nauky, osvity ta tekhnolohii u XXI stolitti v doslidzhenniakh molodykh uchenykh: zbirnyk materialiv dopovidei uchasnykiv vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (2023).

 

Websites

18. Barber R, The Powers of the UN General Assembly to Prevent and Respond to Atrocity Crimes: A Guidance Document (Asia Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, The University of Queensland 2021) 14, 16 <https://www.globalr2p.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021Report-APR2P-UNGA-Powers.pdf> (accessed: 14.01.2024).

19. Blanchfield L, Weed M C, ‘United Nations Security Council and General Assembly Responses to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine’ (Congressional Research Service Insight, 07.03.2022) <https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11876> (accessed: 14.01.2024).

20. General Assembly Holds First-Ever Debate on Historic Veto Resolution, Adopts Texts on Infrastructure, National Reviews, Council of Europe Cooperation. Press-release of the seventy-seventh UN General Assembly session, 68th and 69th meetings. GA/12500. 26 April 2023 <https://press.un.org/en/2023/ga12500.doc.htm> (accessed: 14.01.2024).

21. Ramsden M, ‘Uniting for Peace: The Emergency Special Session on Ukraine’ (Harvard International Law Journal Online, 01.04.2022) <https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/2022/04/ uniting-for-peace-the-emergency-special-session-on-ukraine> (accessed: 14.01.2024).

22. Tomuschat C, Uniting for Peace. General Assembly resolution 377 (V). Introductory Note <https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ufp/ufp.html> (accessed: 14.01.2024).

 

Electronic version Download