The evolution of domestic gender concepts has gone from the pseudo-feminist period of the Soviet occupation to the latest standards of democratic, legal states, from the equalization of women’s rights on men’s terms to the inclusive provision of everyone’s needs, which takes into account biological, physical, social and other features. The development of these provisions in all scientific fields and practical spheres is an actual trend in the progress of modern human-centered society and the state. The domestic gender paradigm evolved from the period of its rethinking after the restoration of independence, the study of the standards and practices of democratic, legal states, the study of gender terminology; the formation of a domestic democratic paradigm for the development of civil society and the state, the practical creation of legal instruments for ensuring human rights, in particular in matters of gender equality, based on European scientific approaches and legislation; formation of balanced gender legislation, in-depth study of topical issues in various scientific fields. The current decade is marked by a strategic vision of the social, economic and other benefits of inclusive gender policy, both in Western European and domestic doctrine and practice. There was a rather striking shift in the emphasis of the gender paradigm from the recognition and legal provision of total equality to inclusion. In the field of jurisprudence, the further advancement of the doctrine of gender law and international gender law, which are already emerging as new trends in jurisprudence, seems relevant. The development of specific provisions of social law becomes important. Cross-sectoral studies that take into account the provisions of law and gender sociology, psychology are expected. Studies of the relationship between the provisions of gender law and medical law are promising. The conceptual direction of research is work with the legal vision of specific tools of gender inclusion. It is expected to become the basis of legislative work. In higher legal educational institutions, appropriate courses have been introduced, programs of educational disciplines have been formed, and they should be developed. An extremely promising direction of research in the field of political science in general and public administration in particular is the formation of provisions on correlation of potential, provision of needs and effectiveness of indicators of public administration with regard to gender. In the field of pedagogic science, scientists should actively participate in the analysis of practical problems during the implementation of the Strategy for the Implementation of Gender Equality in Education until 2030. Historians have worked out a position on the genesis of the image of a woman in national history and traditional Ukrainian culture, and refuted the thesis that matriarchy reigned in Ukrainian traditional culture, the myth of the Special Ukrainian WomanBeregyna. In this context, cross-sectoral studies at the intersection of historical and philosophical sciences, taking into account the provisions of Ukrainian studies regarding the modern vision of the Ukrainian woman, seem relevant. It is worth paying attention to the need to develop the domestic gender paradigm, taking into account authentic Ukrainian cultural and state practices. In the private sector, trainings on a gender-inclusive approach to organizing the work of companies have become relevant. They are predicted to provide important empirical experience and verification material for science. In connection with the war, Ukrainian society and the state are again at the forefront of the development of the gender paradigm. In the scientific field, the issue of the role of women in the problems of the correlation of the global right to peace, the right to peace of the people (as a political category), the right to peace of every person is actively discussed. Scientists and practitioners of the defense sphere are working on solving specific problems. Ukrainian women replace men in complex jobs and at the same time continue to fulfill biological and social roles. This outlines the prospect of forming a new vision of gender inclusion tools that will be exemplary for other European states, both empirically and practically, given the uniqueness of the struggle experience of Ukrainian society and the state in the recent history of European democratic, legal states.

Bibliography

Authored books

1. Bohachevska-Khom’iak M, Bilym po bilomu: zhinky v hromadskomu zhytti Ukrainy, 1884– 1939 (Lybid 1995).

2. Hrytsai I, Mekhanizm zabezpechennia pryntsypu hendernoi rivnosti: teoriia ta praktyka (KhaiTek Pres 2018).

 3. Hrytsiak N, Formuvannia hendernoi polityky v Ukraini: problemy teorii, metodolohii, praktyky (Vydavnytstvo NADU 2004).

4. Kresina I, Ukrainska natsionalna svidomist i suchasni politychni protsesy: etnopolitolohichnyi analiz (Vyshcha shkola 1998).

5. Lebid I, Genderna pedahohika. Navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk (Drukarnia “Ruta” 2015).

6. Levchenko K, Natsionalnyi mekhanizm formuvannia ta vprovadzhennia hendernoi polityky v Ukraini: istoryko-pravovyi ohliad (Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho un-tu vnutrishnikh sprav 2003).

7. Shevchenko L, Kobikova Yu, Lamash I ta in, Hender u psykholohichnykh ta sotsiolohichnykh doslidzhenniakh: navch. posib. (Mizhnar blahod fond “SNID Fond Skhid-Zakhid”, Khark nats un-t vnutr sprav 2015).

8. Smolii V, Stepankov V, Ukrainska natsionalna revoliutsiia XVII st. (1648–1676 rr.) (KyievoMohylianska akademiia 2009).

9. Tsvietkov V, Kresina I, Kovalenko A, Suspilna transformatsiia i derzhavne upravlinnia v Ukraini: Polityko-pravovi determinanty (In-t derzhavy i prava im V M Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy 2003).

10. Uvarova O, Prava zhinok ta henderna rivnist: navch. posib. (FOP Holembovska O O 2018).

11. Zakharchenko P, Istoriia derzhavy ta prava Ukrainy: pidruchnyk (Atika 2005).

Edited and translated books

12. Aheieva V, Martseniuk T (uporiadnyky), Insha optyka: henderni vyklyky suchasnosti: zbirnyk naukovykh prats (Smoloskyp 2019).

13. Blyzniuk V, ‘Genderni vidnosyny v ekonomichnii sferi’, Osnovy teorii genderu: navch. posib. (Skoryk M vidp red, K.I.S. 2004) 327–53.

14. Volosevych I, Kostiuchenko T, Martseniuk T, ‘Otsinka obiznanosti pro isnuvannia Konventsii OON pro likvidatsiiu vsikh form dyskryminatsii shchodo zhinok ta dotychnykh do nei zakoniv’ v Doslidzhennia, provedeni v ramkakh pidhotovky vosmoi periodychnoi dopovidi pro vykonannia Ukrainoiu Konventsii OON Pro likvidatsiiu vsikh form dyskryminatsii shchodo zhinok (2014) 81–102.

15. Vprovadzhennia hendernykh pidkhodiv u diialnist orhaniv vykonavchoi vlady: praktych. posib. dlia derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv (Buromenskyi M red, K.I.S. 2004).

16. Vprovadzhennia hendernykh pidkhodiv u robotu komitetiv Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy: praktychn. posib. (Zaichuk V hol red, K.I.S. 2004).

17. Halustian Yu, ‘Funktsionuvannia natsionalnoho mekhanizmu realizatsii hendernoi polityky: analitychnyi zvit za rezultatamy provedennia interv’iu z ekspertamy u haluzi hendernoi polityky’ Doslidzhennia, provedeni v ramkakh pidhotovky vosmoi periodychnoi dopovidi pro vykonannia Ukrainoiu Konventsii OON Pro likvidatsiiu vsikh form dyskryminatsii shchodo zhinok (2014) 5–26.

18. Henderna ekspertyza ukrainskoho zakonodavstva (kontseptualni zasady) (Melnyk T red, Lohos 2001).

19. Hendernyi portret Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti: nauk.-prakt. vydannia (Nalyvaiko L zah red, Dniprop derzh un-t vnutr sprav 2020) 94.

20. Lavrinenko N, ‘Henderna dynamika sotsialno-ekonomichnoho statusu’ Ukrainske suspilstvo 1992–2004. Monitorynh sotsialnykh zmin (Vorona V, Shulha M red, Instytut sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy 2004) 81–89.

21. Rozuminnia maskulinnosti ta gendernoi rivnosti v sektori bezpeky Ukrainy ta predstavlennia rezultativ doslidzhennia: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 25 berez. 2021 r.) (Cherniei V, Husariev S, Cherniavskyi S ta in redkol, Nats akad vnutr sprav 2021).

22. Rosh A, Persha stat. Zminy ta kryza cholovichoi identychnosti (Slavinska I per z fr, Osnovy 2018). 23. Statuty Velykoho kniazivstva Lytovskoho, t 1: Statut Velykoho kniazivstva Lytovskoho 1529 roku (S Kivalov, P Muzychenko, A Pankov red, Yurydychna literatura 2002).

24. Usenko I (red), Pravovyi zvychai yak dzherelo ukrainskoho prava IX–XIX st. (Naukova dumka 2006).

Journal articles

25. Anishchuk N, ‘Systema hendernoho prava: poniattia ta osnovni strukturni elementy’ (2010) 9 Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoho universytetu “Odeska yurydychna akademiia” 370–81.

26. Berlach A, Matseliukh I, ‘Formuvannia ta zakriplennia pryntsypiv hendernoi rivnosti v mizhnarodnykh normatyvno-pravovykh aktakh’ [2023] 2 (2) Pravo i suspilstvo 259–64.

27. Borovtsova M, ‘Hender yak nepovtorna reprezentatsiia stati’ [2012] 17 (5) Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Psykholohiia 6–12.

 28. Brovar O, ‘Stan vuhilnoi promyslovosti Donbasu ta yii vidbudova u 1943–1945 rr.’ (2006) 95 Kultura narodov Prychernomoria 12–17.

29. Cherniakhivska V, ‘Istorychnyi dosvid stanovlennia ukrainskoi modeli hendernoho parytetu’ (2016) 10 Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok <http://www.dy.nayka.com. ua/?op=1&z=1012> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

30. Dudnyk R, ‘Henderne pravo ta systema prava: problemy teorii ta praktyky’ (2022) 4 Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo 23–6.

31. Hrabovska I, ‘Ievrostandarty ta ukrainska henderna polityka: tochky peretynu’ [2018] 7 (2) Molodyi vchenyi 474–8.

32. Hrabovska I, ‘Problema zhinochoho politychnoho liderstva v suchasnii Ukraini: sotsiofilosofskyi analiz’ (2015) Aktualne naukowe problemy. Rozpatrzenie, decyzja, praktyka: Zbior raportow naukowych 93–5 (in Ukrainian).

33. Hrabovska I, ‘Problemy ta perspektyvy zhinky v suchasnii ukrainskii politytsi’ (2001) 6 Suchasnist 54–9.

34. Hrytsiak N, ‘Problemy transformatsii derzhavnoho mekhanizmu zabezpechennia rivnykh prav i mozhlyvostei zhinok i cholovikiv v Ukraini’ [2003] 1/1–3(9) Upravlinnia suchasnym mistom 26–33.

35. Kharytonova O, ‘Hendernyi meinstryminh u kryminalnomu pravi Ukrainy: osnovni aktsenty reform u sferi protydii seksualnym zlochynam’ (2020) 2 Porivnialno-analitychne pravo 175–80.

36. Kis O, ‘Definitsii feminizmu’ (2000) 17 Nezalezhnyi kulturolohichnyi chasopys “I” 14–21.

37. Klymchuk I, ‘Formuvannia i rozvytok feministskykh pidkhodiv u teorii mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn’ (2016) 109 Hileia: naukovyi visnyk 300–5.

38. Lavrinenko N, ‘Zhinochyi rukh u postkomunistychnii Ukraini: dosiahnennia i prorakhunky’ (1995) 13 Politychnyi portret Ukrainy: biuleten doslidno-navchalnoho tsentru “Demokratychni initsiatyvy”

 9–14.

39. Martseniuk T, ‘Zhinky u “velykii politytsi”: hendernyi analiz Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy’ (2018) 1 Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Sotsiolohiia 43–53.

40. Onishchenko N, Lvova O, ‘Henderna rivnist: krok do rozvytku chy moralna kryza suchasnoho suspilstva?’ (2013) 62 Derzhava i pravo. Yurydychni i politychni nauky 4.

41. Smolnitska M, ‘Zhinka v radianskomu suspilstvi: ofitsiinyi obraz i realna praktyka’ (2011) 16 Ukraina XX st.: kultura, ideolohiia, polityka 162–74.

42. Strelchenko O, Bukhtiiarova I, Bukhtiiarov O, ‘Hendernyi meinstryminh pid chas realizatsii publichno-pravovykh povnovazhen na shliakhu yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv: administratyvno-pravovyi aspekt’ (2022) 5 Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii 153.

43. Zernetska O, Myronchuk O, ‘Henderna polityka u sferi akademichnoi nauky’ (2008) 5 Politychnyi menedzhment 116–27.

Conference papers

44. Bundak O, ‘Henderni studii: realii ta perspektyvy’ v Sotsialni praktyky formuvannia hendernoi chutlyvosti y tolerantnosti: materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu (2016) 109–19.

45. Dudnyk R, ‘Mistse hendernoho prava u systemi prava Ukrainy’ v Yevropeiski oriientyry rozvytku Ukrainy v umovakh viiny ta hlobalnykh vyklykiv ХХI stolittia: synerhiia naukovykh, osvitnikh ta tekhnolohichnykh rishen: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., t 1 (Kivalov S zah red, Yurydyka 2023) 84–5.

Theses

46. Bureichak T, ‘Konstruiuvannia gendernykh identychnostei v dyskursakh reklamy’ (dys kand sots nauk, 2006).

47. Svavolia I, ‘Kontseptualni zasady ta instytutsiini mekhanizmy realizatsii hendernoi polityky Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu’ (dys kand polit nauk, 2020).

Websites

48. Bodnar A, ‘Zhinky shakhtarskoho Donbasu i viiny’ (Teksty, 25.05.2017) <https://texty. org.ua/archive-blogs/76778/Zhinky_shahtarskogo_Donbasu_i_vijny-76778> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

49. Buiskykh Yu, ‘“Berehynia”: sproba dekonstruktsii odnoho “kabinetnoho” mifa’ (Ukraina Moderna, 18.05.2018) <http://uamoderna.com/md/buyskykh-berehynia-myth> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

50. Donchenko O, ‘Henderne pravo u pytanniakh ta vidpovidiakh’ (Iurydychnyi fakultet Chernivetskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Yuriia Fedkovycha) <https://law.chnu.edu. ua/henderne-pravo-u-pytanniakh-ta-vidpovidiakh> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

51. ‘Formula myru. Pravo liudyny na myr’ (Ukrinform, 13.12.2023) <https://www.ukrinform.ua/ rubric-presshall/3799000-formula-miru-pravo-ludini-na-mir.html> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

52. ‘Genderni konferentsii v KPI’ (KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho) <https://kpi.ua/05-11-04> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

53. Kis O, ‘Koho oberihaie berehynia, abo matriarkhat yak cholovichyi vynakhid’ (Gender in de fail? 02.12.2019) <https://genderindetail.org.ua/library/ukraina/kogo-oberigae-bereginyaabomatriarhat-yak-cholovichiy-vinahid-1341287.html> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

54. Kuzmenko L, ‘Kateryna Levchenko: Yevrointehratsiini protsesy – duzhe serioznyi katalizator hendernoi polityky’ <https://longread.povaha.org.ua/kateryna-levchenkoyevrointegratsijniprotsesy-duzhe-serjoznyj-katalizator-gendernoyi-polityky> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

55. ‘Prohres Ukrainy u hendernomu pytanni zadovolniaie YeS – Stefanishyna’ (Ukrinform, 22.11.2023) <https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/3790250-progres-ukraini-u-gendernomupitanni-zadovolnae-es-stefanisina.html> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

56. Seliukova N, ‘Henderno-inkliuzyvnyi pidkhid: try porady dlia vashoi orhanizatsii’ (30.08.2022) <https://www.prostir.ua/?news=henderno-inklyuzyvnyj-pidhid-try-poradydlyavashoji-orhanizatsiji> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

57. ‘Ukrainski zhinky zaminiuiut u shakhtakh cholovikiv, yaki pishly na front: fotoreportazh iz-pid zemli “Radio Svoboda”’ <https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/ukrayina-vuhilni-shakhtyzhinkyviyna/32695783.html> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

58. Uotson K, Henderni pytannia v sektori oborony: zbirnyk informatsiino-metodychnykh materialiv (Tsentr DKZS, OBSIe/BDIPL, OON Zhinky, 2020) <https://www.osce.org/files/f/ documents/a/b/468957.pdf> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

59. ‘VR mozhe poshyryty henderni kvoty na posady derzhsluzhby – Korniienko’ (Ukrinform, 22.11.2023) <https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/3790220-vr-moze-posiritigendernikvoti-na-posadi-derzsluzbi-kornienko.html> (accessed: 08.01.2024)

60. ‘Vseukrainska naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia “Zakhyst sotsialno vrazlyvykh hrup: mizhnarodnyi ta natsionalnyi vymiry”’ (NAN Ukrainy, 25.10.2023) <https://www.nas.gov. ua/EN/Messages/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=10670> (accessed: 08.01.2024).

61. ‘Zhinka u tradytsiinii ukrainskii kulturi: mify i pravda: Interv’iu vykonuvacha obov’iazkiv zaviduvacha viddilu sotsialnoi antropolohii Instytutu narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy doktora istorychnykh nauk Oksany Kis prohrami “Sharovary-shou” radiostantsii “Ukrainske radio ‘Kultura’” (NAN Ukrainy, 28.07.2019) <https://www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/Pages/View. aspx?MessageID=5359> (accessed: 08.01.2024)

62. Zinchenko N, ‘Hanna Zolotarenko: tretia druzhyna Khmelnytskoho, yaka keruvala i nym, i hetmanatom’ (Ukrainky) <https://ukrainky.com.ua/ganna-zolotarenko-tretya-druzhynahmelnyczkogoyaka-keruvala-i-nym-i-getmanatom> (accessed: 08.01.2024).