The adoption and implementation of the Law “On Administrative Procedure” has introduced new regulations not only for the adoption of administrative acts or their appeal, but also for their execution. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to analyze the current regulatory framework for the execution of administrative acts in light of legislative innovations, as well as the currently limited administrative and judicial practice in this area. Such an analysis will help identify key issues that may arise during the practical implementation of the provisions of the Law “On Administrative Procedure” and develop guidelines to avoid or overcome them.

The article is divided into three sections. The first part discusses the general requirements for the regulation of the execution of administrative acts, including initial provisions and models of regulation for the execution of voluntarily unexecuted administrative acts in other countries and Ukraine. The second part analyzes the regulatory framework for ensuring the execution of administrative acts, focusing on the provisions of the law related to the forced execution of administrative acts that are not voluntarily implemented by the obligated person (the addressee). This section emphasizes determining the moment when the obligation to execute an administrative act arises. The third part addresses measures of influence in the forced execution of an administrative act. It covers the goals, purposes, and procedural aspects of measures such as performing actions on behalf of the obligated person by another party, imposing monetary penalties for non-compliance with an administrative act, and direct enforcement measures.

The article concludes that the new regulations on the execution of administrative acts under the Law “On Administrative Procedure” are designed to strengthen the role of administrative bodies as responsible decision-makers. These regulatory innovations equip administrative bodies with the necessary tools for the effective execution of their acts and influence not only the execution process but also other aspects of public administration activities, particularly control functions.

Bibliography

Authored books

1. Shkolyk A, Administratyvno-protsedurne zakonodavstvo ta yoho systematyzatsiia (Helvetyka 2020). 2. Tymoshchuk V, Boiko I, Shkolyk A, Shkolnyi Ye, Zakon “Pro administratyvnu protseduru”: zahalni prozori pravyla vzaiemodii mizh derzhavoiu ta hromadianamy y biznesom. Posibnyk dlia publichnykh sluzhbovtsiv (Kyiv 2022).

Edited books

3. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Zakonu Ukrainy “Pro administratyvnu protseduru” (V Tymoshchuk red, Kyiv 2023).

Journal articles

4. Aver’ianov V, ‘Znachennia administratyvnykh protsedur u reformuvanni administratyvnoho prava’ [2009] 3 Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava 10.

5. Boiko I, ‘Rol i znachennia administratyvnoi protsedury u publichnomu administruvanni’ [2022] 69 Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo 229–236.

6. Briiede Ya, Boiko I, ‘Pravova pryroda ta oznaky administratyvnoho akta (u porivnialnomu konteksti Latvii ta Ukrainy)’ [2023] 163 Problemy zakonnosti 24.

7. Komziuk A, Komziuk M, Lypii Ye, ‘Vykonannia administratyvnykh aktiv: novatsii pryiniatoho zakonu “Pro administratyvnu protseduru”’ [2022] 33(4) Vcheni zapysky Tavriiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Yurydychni nauky 38–44

8. Melnyk R, ‘Konstytutyvni oznaky administratyvnoho akta: krytyka ta analiz’ [2023] 162 Problemy zakonnosti 93–115.

9. Muza O, ‘Realni akty yak instrument publichnoho administruvannia’ [2021] 1(79) Universytetski naukovi zapysky 83–90.

10. Olashyn V, ‘Obov’iazkovist vykonannia administratyvnoho aktu ta zakhody vplyvu’ [2024] 12(2) Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia 98–103.

11. Pysarenko N, Shkolyk A, Balakarieva I, ‘Pryntsyp ofitsiinoho doslidzhennia v diialnosti administratyvnykh orhaniv ta sudiv’ [2022] 159 Problemy zakonnosti 6–27.

12. Soloviova O, ‘Deiaki mirkuvannia pro pryntsypy administratyvnoi protsedury’ [2023] 163 Problemy zakonnosti 248–266.

13. Tymoshchuk V, ‘Shchodo vprovadzhennia zakonu “Pro administratyvnu protseduru”’ [2022] 4(39) Administratyvne pravo i protses 36.

14. Zadyraka N, ‘Pryntsyp dobrosovisnosti yak pryntsyp zdiisnennia administratyvnoi protsedury’ [2023] 163 Problemy zakonnosti 68–79.