| Article | Can the Scientific and Non-Classical Cognition of Law be Possible? |
|---|---|
| Authors | Havryliuk R. |
| Name of magazine | Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version) |
| Issue | 1 / 2014 |
| Pages | 94 - 105 |
| Annotation | The article is a continuation of the analysis, aforementioned on the pages of the legal journal «Law of Ukraine», of the problem of philosophic-methodological selfdetermination of legal science: what must and can it be — science in the literal sense of the word or any other kind of cognition of legal reality? The problem is outlined directly, can the scientific non-classic cognition of law be possible? With this purpose there is given a substance of non-classic standards of the scientism and, therewith, are comprehended the most essential results of non-classic cognition of law by means of cognitive tradition of a regenerated natural law. There is grounded the conclusion that the scientific non-classic cognition of law is possible, while the resume by M. Tarasov «epistemological model of natural-legal cognition cannot be applied to jurisprudence» in the context of non-classic standards of scientism is nonauthentic. |
| Keywords | cientific cognition, classic standards of scientism, non-classic standards of scientism, social nature of law, ontological pluralism of law, a priori law, law with changing content, living law, stable legal range. |
| References | |
| Electronic version | Download |