The article is devoted to comprehension of problems in pluralism interpretation of comparative jurisprudence in theoretical, spatial (geographic) and methodological dimensions.

The author emphasizes that in the late XX – early XXI century increased not only practical importance of comparative jurisprudence, but also understanding of its own transformation, as well as the role and purpose in the system of legal science, identification of future development trends in terms of radical changes in the legal reality and jurisprudence. Whereas the analysis of problems in understanding of comparative jurisprudence shows that there is no universally accepted approach to the interpretation of the concept, structure, objectives, functions and other components of the content of this field of legal research, its relationship with different legal, social and human sciences, legal forms of knowledge of reality.

The author substantiates the necessity and feasibility of understanding forms of comparative legal research on the subject, methodological problems and legal research links with comparative research within other social and human sciences, as well as through theoretical structure of scientific disciplines, substantive and methodological research facilities, «leading edge» of science and so on.