The problems of the article are determined by the discourse on the presence of norms of different legal nature in the regulatory mechanism of public construction law, as well as the structuring of their influence on social relations in the construction sphere.

The purpose of the article is to obtain new knowledge about the role of administrative and legal norms in public construction law. The starting position of the author is that construction law belongs to branch formations of a complex legal nature, which causes the interference of regulatory methods of various origins.

The author, firstly, supports the position of researchers who recognize leading methods in this set of administrative, economic and civil law; secondly, it justifies the dominant role of norms in the application of the administrative-legal method of regulating public construction law relations.

It is emphasized that administrative and legal norms of public construction law are associated with normative legal understanding. They provide the state-authority components of the regulatory system, form relations of power and subordination (direct or indirect), generate relations of administrative-delict content.

It is noted that the administrative-legal norm in construction law has the following characteristics: it is a rule of conduct; this rule is formally defined; this rule is mandatory on the construction site; objectified at the will of the state; aims to regulate construction social relations; provided with state guarantees.

The content of the functions of administrative and legal norms in public construction law is revealed. The establishing, authorizing, regulatory, security, and organizational functions are covered in detail.

Bibliography

Authored books

1. Bevzenko V, Publichne budivelne pravo Ukrainy: posibnyk (Dakor 2022) (in Ukrainian).

2. Borodin I, Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: pidruchnyk (Alerta 2019) (in Ukrainian).

3. Smokovych M, Bevzenko V, Administratyvnyi protses v Ukraini: teoriia i praktyka: pidruchnyk (Dakor 2021) (in Ukrainian).

4. Uhnenko Ye, Tymchenko O, Bielikova N, Osnovy orhanizatsii budivnytstva ta budivelnoho vyrobnytstva: Konspekt lektsii, сh 1 (UkrDUZT 2019) (in Ukrainian).

Edited books

5. Administratyvne pravo: pidruchnyk (Bytiak Iu red, Pravo 2020) (in Ukrainian).

6. Kolpakov V, ‘Administratyvnyi prostupok z pozytsii dynamichnoho pravorozuminnia’ Novitni dosiahnennia ta vektory rozvytku suchasnoi yurysprudentsii, сh 1 (Kolomoiets T red, Liha-Pres 2021) 313–37 (in Ukrainian).

7. Melnyk R (red), Zahalne administratyvne pravo: pidruchnyk (Helvetyka 2023) (in Ukrainian).

 8. Osoblyve administratyvne pravo: pidruchnyk (Vizer B, Lazur Ya, Karabin T, Bilash O red, Helvetyka 2022) (in Ukrainian).

Encyclopedias

9. Shemshuchenko Yu, ‘Budivelne pravo’ v Yurydychna entsyklopediia, t 1 (Iu Shemshuchenko ta in red, Ukr entsykl 1998) (in Ukrainian).

Journal articles

10. Kolpakov V, ‘Misiia administratyvnoho prava v dyskursi postmodernu: vid suputnyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia do prava yurydychnykh smysliv’ (2022) 1 Amparo 23–36. DOI https://doi.org/10.26661/2786-5649-2022-1-03 (in Ukrainian).

11. Komar Ye, ‘Budivelne pravo yak nova navchalna dystsyplina u neprofilnykh vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy’ (2013) 13 Pravove rehuliuvannia ekonomiky 28–7 (in Ukrainian). 12. Kvasnitska O, ‘Definitsii u budivelnomu zakonodavstvi Ukrainy’ (2009) 45 Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava 336–40 (in Ukrainian).

13. Pasechnyk O, ‘Metamodernistske pravorozuminnia yak refleksiia kolyvan piznannia suchasnoho prava’ (2022) 2 Yurydychnyi visnyk 16–22 (in Ukrainian).

14. Savitskyi R, ‘Zakhody administratyvnoho prypynennia v diialnosti Derzhavnoi arkhitekturno-budivelnoi inspektsii Ukrainy’ (2014) 29 Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu 188–91 (in Ukrainian).

15. Stukalenko O, ‘Derzhavna arkhitekturno-budivelna inspektsiia Ukrainy v systemi normatyvnoho rehuliuvannia budivelnykh pravovidnosyn’ (2014) 28 Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu 188–91 (in Ukrainian).

16. Stukalenko O, ‘Mistse budivelnoho prava v systemi prava’ (2016) 3 Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu 25–7 (in Ukrainian).

17. Tropina H, ‘Poniattia ta oznaky administratyvnoi vidpovidalnosti za porushennia zakonodavstva u budivelnii diialnosti’ (2012) 4 Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav 302–9 (in Ukrainian).

18. Tsilenko V, ‘Pravove rehuliuvannia budivelnoi diialnosti: sklad budivelnykh pravovidnosyn’ (2014) 2 Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho” 225–35 (in Ukrainian).

19. Yermolenko V, ‘Mistobudivne pravo v systemi prava Ukrainy’ [2019] 10 (4) Pravo. Liudyna. Dovkillia 85–94 (in Ukrainian).

Conference papers

20. Dubynska A, ‘Teoretychni zasady pravovoho rehuliuvannia budivelnoi haluzi’ v Budivelne pravo: problemy teorii i praktyky [zb. nauk. pr.]: materialy Pershoi nauk.prakt. konf. (Beskydy 2017) 56–61 (in Ukrainian).

21. Khalabudenko O, ‘Budivelne pravo: deiaki metodolohichni pidkhody do sfery pravovoi diisnosti, yaka formuietsia’ v Budivelne pravo: problemy teorii i praktyky [zb. nauk. pr.]. Materialy Druhoi nauk.-prakt. konf. (Ekonomichna dumka 2018) 38–42 (in Ukrainian).

22. Kulikov P, ‘Pravove rehuliuvannia budivelnoi diialnosti v suchasnykh umovakh derzhavotvorennia Ukrainy’ v Budivelne pravo: problemy teorii i praktyky [zb. nauk. pr.]: materialy Pershoi nauk.-prakt. konf. (Beskydy 2017) 7–10 (in Ukrainian).

23. Mamontov I, ‘Kontseptualizatsiia budivelnoho prava yak novoi haluzi u pravovii systemi Ukrainy’ v Budivelne pravo: problemy teorii i praktyky [zb. nauk. pr.]: materialy Pershoi nauk.-prakt. konf. (Beskydy 2017) 23–7 (in Ukrainian).

24. Panibudlaska A, ‘Budivelne pravo Ukrainy: aktualni problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku’ v Budivelne pravo: problemy teorii i praktyky [zb. nauk. pr.]: materialy Pershoi nauk.prakt. konf. (Beskydy 2017) 51–5 (in Ukrainian).

Theses

25. Ivashchenko O, ‘Oskarzhennia administratyvnykh posluh u Velykii Brytanii ta Ukraini (porivnialno-pravovyi analiz)’ (dys kand yuryd nauk, 2012) (in Ukrainian).

26. Moroz A, ‘Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia normuvannia u budivnytstvi’ (dys d-ra filosof nauk, 2022) (in Ukrainian).

27. Myronets I, ‘Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia budivelnoi diialnosti v Ukraini’ (dys kand yuryd nauk, 2012) (in Ukrainian).

Websites

28. Kovalenko N, ‘Analiz praktyky Verkhovnoho Sudu pry vyrishenni sporiv pro oskarzhennia rishen, dii, bezdiialnosti orhaniv derzhavnoho arkhitekturno-budivelnoho kontroliu’ (Sudovo-iurydychna hazeta. Bloh, 10.06.2020) <https://sud.ua/ru/news/ blog/170879-analiz-praktiki-verkhovnogo-sudu> (accessed: 25.12.2022) (in Ukrainian).