In the current conditions and post-war reconstruction of Ukraine, there is a need to eliminate some inconsistencies in existing and new legislative acts of civil law at the stage of emergence, registration of termination of lease relations.

The purpose of this article is to study the features of a lease contract through the prism of doctrinal and legislative provisions, which necessitates the study of the legal framework that ensures the functioning of the mechanism of civil law regulation of the use of real estate and to clarify the role of the contract in this system of interconnection of legal phenomena.

The author made a system of agreements that gives possibility to give property for use and clarifies the legal status of the parties in the agreements. Considers the peculiarities of the legal regulation of certain types of contractual obligations to transfer property for use. The author examines the legal consequences of breaching obligations which were taken by the parties on themselves by signing contracts that transfers property for use: hiring (rent) and other types, such as rent, loan, commercial concession, leasing. Particular attention is paid for granting the tenant the right to use a land plot. The author identifies and suggests ways to solve theoretical and practical problems that arise from conclusion, amendment, and termination of contracts under which property is transferred for use.

Bibliography

Edited books

1. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: U 2 t. T. II (O Dzera (ker avt kol), N Kuznietsova, V Luts red, 6-te vyd, pererob. i dopovn, Yurinkom Inter 2019).

Journal articles

2. Kalaur I, ‘Strok korystuvannia mainom yak istotna umova dohovoru naimu (orendy)’ [2009] 21 Aktualni problemy vdoskonalennia chynnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy 109–113.

3. Karmaza O, ‘Dohovir naimu zhytla ta dohovir orendy zhytla: yikh spivvidnoshennia’ [2016] 2 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 18–23.

4. Lavrynenko M, ‘Istotni umovy dohovoru naimu (orendy) zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy, Frantsii ta FRN’ [2019] 33 Pravova derzhava 92–101.

5. Matushchak M, ‘Porivnialno-pravova kharakterystyka poniattia dohovoru naimu (orendy) nerukhomoho maina’ [2015] 20(2) Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravoznavstvo 146–153.

6. Moroz M, ‘Strok dohovoru naimu (orendy) ta osoblyvosti yoho ponovlennia’ [2016] 4 Pravo ta innovatsii 49–55.

7. Paskevych Yu, ‘Pravova pryroda dohovoru naimu (orendy)’ [2013] 22(I)1 Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, Seriia Pravo 199.

8. Sibilov M, ‘Osnovni novely proektu novoho Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy’ [1997] 3 Ukrainske pravo 37–38.

9. Spasybo-Fatieieva I, ‘Vidchuzhennia prava orendy’ [2010] 4(63) Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy 118–127.

Conference papers

10. Semenka O, ‘Dohovir naimu (orendy) budivli abo inshoi kapitalnoi sporudy za tsyvilnym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy’ (dys kand yuryd nauk, 2018).

11. Telestakova A, ‘Systema dohovoriv pro nadannia posluh v tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy’ (dys kand yuryd nauk, 2008).

12. Khashchivska N, ‘Tsyvilno-pravove rehuliuvannia strokiv u dohovorakh pro peredannia maina u tymchasove korystuvannia’ (avtoref dys kand yuryd nauk, 2011).