Convicted women are a special category of persons detained in places of deprivation of Liberty. They have specific social, psychological, biological and other characteristics. This requires a special approach to the study of the personality of the convicted woman, as well as to explain their behavior in a different way than with men. In this regard, it is necessary to have a full understanding of the information of prisoners when personalizing the execution of punishment in relation to women, which at first glance is inadmissible not to take into account insignificant features. When examining the personality of a woman, various methods should be used to determine these or other qualities. At the same time, there are some signs or regularities that arise from a general idea of the conviction. Of course, there are exceptions to each rule, but in any case it is possible to create a certain portrait of a condemned woman. These characteristics should be taken into account when personalizing the execution of the sentence in the form of deprivation of Liberty. However, Penitentiary practice shows that the opposite situation is observed in places of deprivation of Liberty: adult women conscientiously adhere to the regime of punishment, do not initiate conflict situations and, unlike men, do not try to be a leader among prisoners. This applies especially to older women. Therefore, when personalizing the execution of the sentence, it is necessary to take into account their potential positive side menu and stimulate as much as possible. But in correctional colonies, mature and older women are much less likely than young people. The analysis of the experiment shows that the violation of the established rules of punishment accounts for a considerable amount of young-aged convicts. This fact has long been known and has received a fairly justified explanation. Young women are at the initial stage of independent life, experiencing a complex process of penitentiary worship, as a result of which they are characterized by selfishness, indifference to people and society, indifferent attitude to the law and the punishment regime. 

Bibliography

Authored books

1. Agayeva K, Ethics and Gender: an analysis of socio-moral behavior (Legal literature 2007) (in English).

2. Aliyev A, Aliyev E, Maharramov A, Mammadov A, Guseynova F, European law. The textbook (Sun-B 2016) (in English).

3. Aliyev A, Human rights: textbook (Nurlar 2019) (in English).

4. Birmingham L, Mason D, Grubin D, Prevalence of mental disorder in remand prisoners consecutive case study (BMJ 1996) (in English).

5. Gunn J, Maden A, Swinton M, Treatment needs of prisoners with psychiatric disorders (BMJ 1991) (in English).

6. Huseynova H, Aliyev A, Bayramova P, Nuriyev Ə, Safarov E, Safixanlı A, Elibeyli Q, Protection of women’s Rights: International and national aspects. Course tutoring (Baku 2018) (in English).

7. Hohrjakov G, Paradoksy tjur’my. Problemy, diskussii, predlozhenija (M 1991) (in Russian).

8. Osinskij I, Romanova N, Shiller L, Zhenshhina v tjur’me: nauchnoe izdanie (ChitGU 2004) 121 (in Russian).

9. Zhukov D, Biologicheskie osnovy povedenija. Gumoral’nye mehanizmy: uchebnik (Juridicheskij centr Press 2004) (in Russian). Edited books 10. Embodiment of international conventions in national legislation as a participant of the Republic of Azerbaijan (Suleymanova E ed, Eve 2003) (in English). 11. Kriminologija: uchebnik dlja vuzov (A Dolgovaja red, NORMA – INFRA M 2001) (in Russian).

Journal articles

12. Arditti J, Lambert-Shute J, Joest K, ‘Saturday Morning at the Jail: Implications of Incarceration for Families and Children’ (2003) 5 Family Relations (in English).

13. Sack W, Seidler J, ‘Should children visit their parents in prison?’ [1978] 2 (3) Law and Human Behaviour (in English).

14. Baburin S, Chirkov A, ‘Sistemogenez stressovoj adaptacii osuzhdennyh’ (2018) 1 Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah 72 (in Russian).

15. Baburin S, Zautorova Je, ‘Rabota penitenciarnogo pedagoga-psihologa s negativnymi jemocional’nymi sostojanijami osuzhdennyh v mestah lishenija svobody’ [2016] 4 (67) Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah (in Russian).

16. Debol’skij M, Matveeva I, ‘Suicidal’noe povedenie osuzhdennyh, podozrevaemyh i obvinjaemyh v mestah lishenija svobody’ (2013) 3 Psihologija i parvo (in Russian).

17. Spasennikov B, Smirnov A, ‘Ispravlenie osuzhdennyh muzhchin v processe ispolnenija dlitel’nyh srokov lishenija svobody’ (2009) 8 Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie (in Russian).

18. Stroeva G, ‘Samoispravlenie osuzhdennyh’ (2011) 4 Vektor nauki TGU (in Russian).