.png)
| Article title | Methodology of the Science of Criminal Procedure: The Current State and Development Prospects | ||
| Authors |
Doctor of Law, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine, (Odessa, Ukraine) ID ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3094-7257
Candidate of Law, (Odessa, Ukraine) ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-0261
|
||
| Name of magazine | Legal journal «Law of Ukraine» (Ukrainian version) | ||
| Issue | 9/2019 | ||
| Сторінки | [17-30] | ||
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.33498/louu-2019-09-017 | ||
| Annotation | The study of any object of scientific cognition is conditioned by the availability of appropriate tools – methodology. Today, the urgency of investigating into the issues which pertain to the methodology of the criminal procedure science entails primarily from the current large-scale and radical changes in the national law of criminal procedure intended to make it consistent with the European and international standards; furthermore, it is also backed by the fast-paced development of scientific and technological revolution, rapid updating of knowledge, and increasingly growing scientific and scientific engineering information, all these factors requiring not only elaboration but also a reconsideration of the key concepts and categories in the doctrine of criminal procedure with the use of the updated methodology. Today, in contrast to the methodology of general theoretical jurisprudence, development of the methodology of the criminal procedure law science has not been addressed by scientists on a large enough scale. The purpose of the article is to examine the current state of the methodology by which criminal procedure issues may be studied, and to determine the major promising directions of its improvement. The author studies the issues pertaining to the concept, levels of methodology, principles of methodology, outlines the variety of methodological approaches as strategies for criminal procedure research, and presents own vision regarding the structure of the methodology of criminal procedure science. The author also reviews the general scientific and the special research methods, paying special attention to heuristic methods and methods for studying the electronic component of criminal proceedings.
|
||
| Keywords | ...... | ||
| References |
Bibliography
Authored books 1. Blauberg I ta Judin Je, Stanovlenie i sushhnost’ sistemnogo podhoda: monografija [Formation and Essence of System Approach: Monograph] (Nauka 1973) (in Russian). 2. Glovuk I, Kryminalno-protsesualni funktsii: teoriia, metodologiia ta praktyka realizatsii na osnovi polozhen Kryminalnogo protsesualnogo kodeksu Ukrainy 2012 roku: monografiia [Criminal Procedural Functions: Theory, Methodology and Practice of Implementation Based on the Provisions of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine 2012: Monograph] (Iurydychna literatura 2015) (in Ukrainian). 3. Danylian O ta Dzeban O, Organizatsiia ta metodologiia naukovykh doslidzhen: navchalnyi posibnyk [Organisation and Methodology of Legal Research: Tutorial] (Pravo 2017) (in Ukrainian). 4. Kozachenko O, Kryminalno-pravovi zahody: kulturo-antropologichnyi vymir: monografiia [Criminal Legal Measures: the Cultural and Anthropological Dimension: Monograph] (Ilion 2011) (in Ukrainian). 5. Kovalchuk S, Vchennia pro rechovi dokazy u kryminalnomu protsesi: teoretyko-pravovi ta praktychni osnovy: monografiia [Doctrine on Material Evidence in Criminal Procedure: Theoretical, Legal and Practice Basis: Monograph] (Suprun V P 2017) (in Ukrainian). 6. Kalancha I, Elektronne kryminalne sudochynstvo: peredumovy vynyknennia, suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku: monografiia [Electronic Criminal Justice: Preconditions of Formation, Modern State and Prospects of Development: Monograph] (Pravo 2018) (in Ukrainian). 7. Lutsyk V ta inshi, Suchasnyi kryminalnyi protses krain Ievropy: monografiia [Modern Criminal Procedure in Europe: Monograph] (Pravo 2018) (in Ukrainian). 8. Titko I, Normatyvne zabezpechennia ta praktyka realizatsii pryvatnogo interesu v kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy: monografiia [Normative Provision and Practice of Realization of Private Interests in the Criminal Procedure of Ukraine: Monograph] (Pravo 2016) (in Ukrainian). 9. Trofymenko V, Teoretychni ta pravovi osnovy dyferentsiatsii protsesualnoi formy u kryminalnomu sudochinstvi: monografiia [The Theoretical and Practical basis of Differentiation of Procedural Forms in Criminal Proceedings: Monograph] (Oberih 2016) (in Ukrainian). 10. Ujomov A, Sistemnyj podhod i obshhaja teorija sistem: monogradija [System Approach and General Theory of Systems: Monograph] (Myisl 1978) (in Russian). 11. Farynnyk V, Zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnogo provadzhennia: teoriia ta praktyka: monografiia [Implementation of Measures Ensuing the Criminal Proceedings: Theory and Practice: Monograph] (Alerta 2017) (in Ukrainian). 12. Furman A, Ideia i zmist profesiinogo metodologuvannia [Idea and Content of Professional Methodology] (TNEU 2016) (in Ukrainian).
Edited books 13. Dzeban’ A i Jarotskij V, ‘Obshhemetodologicheskie i jevresticheskie aspekty sovremennyh civilisticheskih issledovanij’ [‘General Methodological and Heuristic Aspects of Modern Civil Studies’] v Zhornokuj Ju i Slipchenko S (red), Metodologija issledovanija problem civilistiki: sbornik statey, posvjashhonnyh pamjati A. A. Pushkina [Methodology for the Study of Problems of Civil Law: Collection of Articles on Memory of A. A. Pushkin] (Pravo 2017) (in Russian). 14. Oborotov Yu, ‘Rivni ta sfery metodologii urysprudentsii’ [‘Levels and Scope of Jurisprudence Methodology’] v Oborotov Yu (red), Kreatyvnist zagalnoteoretychnoi iurysprudentsii: monografiia [Creativity of General Theoretical Jurisprudence: Monograph] (Feniks 2015) (in Ukrainian). 15. Oborotov Yu, ‘Peredmova: formuvannia syntagmy zagalnoteoretychnoi urysprudenwii’ [‘preface: Formation of Syntagma of General Theoretical Jurisprudence’] v Oborotov Iu (red), Metodologiia ta innovatyka zagalnoteoretychnoi iurysprudentsii: monografiia [Methodology and Innovations in General Theoretical Jurisprudence: Monograph] (Feniks 2019) (in Ukrainian).
Jornal articles 16. Bilenchuk P, ‘Metodologichni zasady naukovogo zabezpechennia kryminalnogo provadzhennia’ [‘Methodological Principles of Scientific Provision of Criminal Proceeding’] (2013) 14 Viche 13-5 (in Ukrainian). 17. Dudchenko V, ‘Tendentsii antyformalizmu ta tsinnostei u suchasnii urysprudentsii’ [‘Trends in Anti-formalism and Values in Modern Jurisprudence’] (2012) Naukovi pratsi NU OUA 225-34 (in Ukrainian). 18. Guseltseva M, ‘Metodologbchna optika iak instrument piznannia’ [‘Methodological Optics as a Tool of Cognition’] (2017) 4 Psikhologiia i suspilstvo 39-55 (in Ukrainian). 19. Grinenko A, ‘Metodologija ugolovno-processual’noj nauki’ [‘Methodology of Criminal Procedure Science’] (2003) 9 Gosudarstvo i pravo 54-60 (in Russian). 20. Kelman M, ‘Pereosmyslennia metodologii suchasnogo pravoznavstva’ [‘Reinterpreting the Methodology of Modern Legal Science’] (2016) 837 Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. Urydychni nauky 258-64 (in Ukrainian). 21. Kolomiiets O, ‘Sutnist evrystychnykh funktsii u systemi menedzhmentu’ [‘The Essence of Heuristic Functions in the Management System’] (2013) 769 Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku 41-6 (in Ukrainian). 22. Komlev Ju, ‘Integrativnaja kriminalogija kak osnova metodologicheskoj trianguljacii pri izuchenii prestupnosti’ [‘Integrative Criminology as a Basis of Methodological Triangulation in the Studies of Crime’] (2017) 1 Vestnik Kazanskogo uridicheskogo instituta MVD 6-13 (in Russian). 23. Kostitskii M, ‘Pro nauku kryminalnogo protsesu, kryminalno protsesualne pravo i zakonodavstvo (filosofskii pogliad)’ [‘On Science of Criminal Procedure, Criminal Procedural Law and Legislation (Philosophical View)’] (2013) 1 Urydychnyi chasopys natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav 31-7 (in Ukrainian). 24. Korystin O, Tsilmakh O, ‘Evrestychni metody pobudovy ta perevirky kryminalistychnych versii’ [‘Heuristic Methods of Making and Verifying of Criminalistic Versions’] [2015] 3(19) Publichne parvo 170-9 (in Ukrainian). 25. Okcuta T, ‘Metodologiia doslidzhennia statusu zapasnogo suddi v kryminalnomu provadzhenni’ [‘Methodology of Research of Status of ad hoc Judge in Criminal Proceeding’] [2017] 2(14) Filosofski ta metodologichni problemy prava 117-29 (in Ukrainian).
Conferense papers 26. Tuliakov V, ‘Novitni metody u doslidzheniakh nauky kryminalnogo prava’ [‘Newest Methods in Criminal Law Science Studies’] v Ulianova G (red), Tradytsii ta novatsii urydychnoi nauky: mynule, suchasnist, maibutne [Traditions and Innovations of Legal Science: the Past, Present and Future: the Materials of International Scientific and Practice Conference (Odesa, 19 May 2017)] (2017) (in Ukrainian).
Websites 27. ‘Evrystychni metody’ [‘Heuristic Methods’] (Slovnyk z informatyky) <http://it.slovnyk.ukr/index.php/Evrystychni_metody> (accessed: 05.08.2019) (in Ukrainian).
|
||
|
|||
